Justification of Newton's model

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter neelakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the justification of Newton's model for predicting tidal heights based on the gravitational attraction of the Sun and Moon. The model simplifies the Earth’s structure by using two perpendicular tubes filled with water, assuming constant water density. Critics question the validity of this model due to its oversimplifications, such as neglecting the Earth's non-uniform solid core. Despite these concerns, proponents argue that the model's predictive accuracy validates its use.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's law of universal gravitation
  • Basic knowledge of fluid dynamics
  • Familiarity with the concept of equilibrium in physics
  • Awareness of Earth's geological structure
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of tidal equations from Newton's gravity equation
  • Research the impact of Earth's core composition on gravitational models
  • Study advanced fluid dynamics related to tidal movements
  • Investigate alternative models for predicting tidal heights, such as those incorporating the Earth's shape
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, geophysicists, and students studying gravitational effects on fluid bodies, particularly those interested in tidal mechanics and Earth sciences.

neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1
There is a model devised by Newton to predict the difference in the height of the tides (as observed from the earth) due to the attraction of Sun/moon.It is well known.Here we pretend that two tubes,filled up of water runs from the surface to the centre of the earth.They are taken as perpendicular.Hence using npn-inertial frame of the earth,the difference is found.density of water is assumed constant.

To what extent it is justified?What right do we have to assume this superficial model?
All we can say if a model be prepared like this,for it the equilibrium tide-height difference will be ...
Can you please make it clear?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not following you - "What right"? What does that mean? We believe Newon's model becaus it works. You can derive it from Newton's gravity equation.
 
My question is why does it work at all?We are simply making a model where there is no resemblance.
I say this because
(1)we are taking two orthogonal tubes of water of equal density!
(2)we are neglecting the non uniform solid core solid core of the earth.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
62K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
17K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K