PDA

View Full Version : Why 10?


steersman
Mar30-04, 09:43 PM
Why is 10 a base number? Why not 4? Is it because we can count to 10 on our fingers? This sounds like a stupid question I know but it's been bugging me.

cookiemonster
Mar30-04, 10:33 PM
Nobody knows the exact answer (probably because there is no exact answer), but that's probably about as good an answer as you'll get. It just kinda worked out that way.

cookiemonster

Hurkyl
Mar30-04, 10:38 PM
10 isn't the only one ever used; IIRC the Babylonians did everything base 60. :smile: 10 just happened to "win"

cookiemonster
Mar30-04, 10:52 PM
I can barely keep track of ten numbers, much less sixty. Multiplication would be absolute hell.

cookiemonster

Hurkyl
Mar30-04, 10:55 PM
otoh there are a lot more 1-digit numbers!

cookiemonster
Mar31-04, 12:20 AM
Those are usually the ones that give me trouble...

cookiemonster

ahrkron
Mar31-04, 01:31 AM
I think the mayans used base 20.

Anyway, there are no "base numbers". Any number greater than 1 can be used as a base for a positional system.

And, no matter what number you choose for your base, the representation of that number in that base will be "10" (for instance, 2 in binary is "10"; 3 in base 3 is "10", etc).

HallsofIvy
Mar31-04, 07:39 AM
I think the mayans used base 20.

Anyway, there are no "base numbers". Any number greater than 1 can be used as a base for a positional system.

And, no matter what number you choose for your base, the representation of that number in that base will be "10" (for instance, 2 in binary is "10"; 3 in base 3 is "10", etc).

The Tlingit people who lived along the Pacific coast of North America (Washington State and British Columbia) used sort of a "base 8" (there numeration system wasn't, strictly speaking, a "base" system) because they counted on the spaces between their fingers!
(As in- place index finger of right hand between thumb and index finger of left, say "1", place index finger of right hand between index and middle finger of left say "2", etc.)

selfAdjoint
Mar31-04, 10:25 AM
The classic Greek astronomers had a neat system. They used the Babylonian base 60 but expressed the digits in their own traditional alphabetic system - α = 1, β = 2, and so on with specific combinations for digits above 10. You could probably simulate it by using Roman numerals for base 60 digits, from I to LIX plus zero.

moshek
Apr14-04, 05:24 PM
Not a stupid question at all.
becase we have 10 fingers.

Njorl
Apr14-04, 06:00 PM
The question really should be "Why ten?" not "Why 10?".

Think about it. No matter what base we used, it would still be "10".

Njorl

selfAdjoint
Apr14-04, 06:14 PM
LOL! So true! So the alien with three fingers would say "I have 10 fingers too. 1+1 = 2 and 2+1 = 10."

toloXXX
Apr17-04, 01:51 AM
Why is 10 a base number? Why not 4? Is it because we can count to 10 on our fingers? This sounds like a stupid question I know but it's been bugging me.
Base 10 is for our daily computation...
You dont need to take such a "base" to heart. Modern computers use base 2(-8-16) to represent all the stuff. If you like, you can also define yourself base 3,4,5,6,7 etc. It is not a matter of choice but a matter of which you have to deal with standard and common rules.

JJ
Apr17-04, 08:19 PM
I wonder if the numbers of fingers on a primitive organism determines its future intelligence.

Dayle Record
Apr17-04, 08:57 PM
I had a math teacher in seventh grade, she was from nah awlens, in case you are having trouble with that, it is vernacular for New Orleans. She had a great accent, and described 12 as the queen of the numbahs, because it was divisible by so many primes, and we spent a couple of days discussing bases, and how it would have been much better if we had 12 fingers, so we could have used base 12. All in this thick accent. She was a hoot, in her Lady Bird Johnson hairdo, and pastel suits, she was at least 70 years old then.

moshek
Apr20-04, 04:13 AM
A nice observation Njorl
for the ten and not 10 !

who said we develop already
intelligent mathematics JJ ?

Moshek

please look on :

www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=17243