View Full Version : Rotation
cristina
Apr1-04, 04:27 PM
The radius of a park merry-go-round is 2.2m. To start it rotating, you wrap a rope around it and pull with a force of 260N for 12s. During this time, the merry-go-round makes one complete rotation. a) Find the angular acceleration of the merry-go-round. b) What torque is exerted by the rope on the merry-go-round? c) What is the moment of inertia of the merry-go-round?
A)
The angular acceleration is alpha = Torque/I
I did conceder the merry-go-round as a solid cylinder so I =1/2(MR^2)
Torque = Fr
Acceleration = (260N * 2.2m)/(1/2(MR^2))
I don’t know how to get rid of the M?
B)
Torque = Fr = (260N * 2.2m) = 572 Nm
C) The moment of inertia of the merry-go-round is I =1/2(MR^2)
Can I get the M in the torque from F = ma (after I know the acceleration from a) )?
Thank you
The merry-go-round completes one rotation, i.e 2π radians, in 12 seconds. I think it's valid to apply the normal motion equations here, so:
d\alpha = \alpha _0 + \omega _0t + \frac{1}{2}a_rt^2
2\pi = \frac{1}{2}a_r(12s)^2
a_r = \frac{4\pi }{144s^2}
Now that you know the angular acceleration you can find the merry-go-round's moment of inertia since a = Torque/I as you said. With this method you don't even need to know the shape of the device (and I don't think you are allowed to assume it is a cylinder).
cristina
Apr1-04, 05:17 PM
472Nm*144s^2 = 4(pi)I
I=67968/4(pi) = 5408.72 (I feel there is something with the answer)
It's 572N, not 472N. According to this the mass of the merry-go-round would be 2.7 tons... do you know what the answer should be?
cristina
Apr1-04, 05:36 PM
I = 6554.64 ? I think this is the corect answer but I don't know the rounding if its correct.
I also get 6,544. I'm not sure what you're asking, is this not the correct answer?
cristina
Apr1-04, 05:44 PM
Yes, is it the correct answer? Is the unite of I is the same as the unite of mass?
No, the unit of I, the moment of inertia, is m^2kg. I don't know if it's the right answer or not, but as far as I'm concerned my calculations are correct.
cristina
Apr1-04, 06:25 PM
I really appreciate your help. I think the answer is correct But I am not sure if I should round it to 6555 m^2.kg?
cristina
Apr2-04, 03:52 AM
like in this case what would be the significant figures rule?
Integral
Apr2-04, 06:33 AM
The general rule would be that you cannot have more significant digits then the numbers used in the calcultion. I would say the answer should be
6.6x 103 m2kg
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.