Calculating Probability Current for Wave Function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the probability current for a given wave function, specifically \(\psi(x) = Ae^{ik_{0}x - ax^{2}}\). Participants are exploring different methods to derive the probability current and questioning the validity of certain equations used in the process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss two approaches to calculate the probability current: one using a standard formula involving the imaginary component of the wave function and another using a more general expression. There are questions about the applicability of the simpler equation and whether it is only valid for plane waves.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into their calculations and questioning the assumptions behind the equations used. There is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the methods, but various interpretations of the results are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the presence of the term \(e^{-2ax^{2}}\) in the probability current calculation raises questions about whether it should be absorbed into the constant \(A\) or if it indicates that the probability current is dependent on \(x\).

T-7
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a wave function,

[tex]\psi(x)=Ae^{ik_{0}x-ax^{2}}[/tex]

All I am required to do is calc. the prob. current. This I have done using the usual

[tex]j = \frac{\hbar}{m}.|A|^{2}.\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial z}[/tex]

where [tex]\varphi}[/tex] is the imaginary component of the exponent of e.

It comes (of course) to [tex]j = \frac{\hbar}{m}.|A|^{2}.k_{0}[/tex].

But, doing it the long way (I just thought I would), with

[tex]j = \frac{\hbar}{2mi}.(\psi*\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}-\psi\frac{\partial\psi*}{\partial x})[/tex]

I end up with the same result, but [tex]e^{-2ax^{2}}[/tex] attached. Since taking [tex]\psi*[/tex] only changes the sign of the imaginary component, this seems inevitable... anyone know what I'm doing wrong?

Cheers :-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apparently A from the general expression you quoted

[tex]j=\frac{\hbar}{m}|A|^{2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}[/tex]

includes the real exponential...
 
T-7 said:

Homework Statement



I have a wave function,

[tex]\psi(x)=Ae^{ik_{0}x-ax^{2}}[/tex]

All I am required to do is calc. the prob. current. This I have done using the usual

[tex]j = \frac{\hbar}{m}.|A|^{2}.\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial z}[/tex]

where [tex]\varphi}[/tex] is the imaginary component of the exponent of e.
? Where did you see this equation? It does not look right to me. are you sure this is not only for plane waves??
 
nrqed said:
? Where did you see this equation? It does not look right to me. are you sure this is not only for plane waves??

I'm thinking the simpler equation can only apply where the exponent of e in the wave function is wholly imaginary.

Using the equation

[tex]j = \frac{\hbar}{2mi}\left( \psi^{*} \frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x} - \psi \frac{\partial\psi^{*}}{\partial x} \right)[/tex]

I obtain

[tex]\frac{\hbar}{m}|A|^{2}e^{-2ax^{2}} k_{0}[/tex]

I presume that's correct. In which case, I don't think the [tex]e^{-2ax^{2}}[/tex] should be absorbed into A. The probability current is a function of x.

Hmmm.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
95
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K