Weight of landing from jumping

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter andrewz182
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Weight
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the forces experienced by a person landing from a jump, specifically focusing on the weight or force readings on a scale at the moment of impact. Participants explore the relationship between mass, acceleration, and the forces exerted during landing, with a particular emphasis on the implications of jumping from a height of 2 feet.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant queries how to calculate the force or weight experienced upon landing, suggesting a formula involving mass, acceleration, and time.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on what is meant by "calculation of pounds" and the context of the debate.
  • There is a discussion about whether the scale would register a higher force when jumping onto it compared to standing still.
  • A participant questions if a 160 lb person could exert enough force upon landing to make the scale read over 400 lbs.
  • One participant explains that force is equal to mass times acceleration, noting that the maximum deceleration affects the force experienced at impact.
  • Another participant suggests that the force reading on the scale may reflect the instantaneous force at the moment of deceleration rather than the true weight after coming to rest.
  • Considerations are raised about external factors such as air resistance and the potential for scale damage during the landing.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanics of force measurement during landing, with no consensus reached on the exact calculations or outcomes involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various assumptions, such as the nature of deceleration, the impact of external forces, and the limitations of the scale's response time, which remain unresolved.

andrewz182
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
if i were a 160 lb person who could jump a height of 2 feet, what would be my "weight/force/momentum" or whatever measurement used that will result in a calculation of pounds in the end.

this is in no way me asking for help with hw, this is over a debate i had with a friend, and neither of us can really figure it out...

would it be (mass x acceleration x time)??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
what do you mean by
will result in a calculation of pounds in the end.
?
 
or "pounds of force"
 
what do mean by "in the end"? I don't understand what is the debate about either
 
i mean at the point of impact with the ground.
 
ok to specify: what weight would a scale read if i were to jump on it from 2 feet?? would it just be calculating momentum??
 
so I guess you are saying that whether the downward force measured by a scale on the ground would register a bigger reading if you jump onto the scale as oppose to standing still on it? what do you think?
 
but more specifically, would it be possible for a 160 lb person, who is able to jump 2 feet up in the air, to exert enough force upon a scale to read over 400 lbs?
 
Force is equal to mass times acceleration. The same velocity can be achieved with a faster acceleration over a shorter period of time. There's no limit to the amount of force involved in a 2 foot landing, other than the maximum deceleration will be limited by how much compression there is at the contact point.
 
  • #10
the force you are talking about is probably the instantaneous reading NOT at impact but when your body has just been fully decelerate to velocity zero I think, and before the scale re-adjust and show your "true weight"

mind you there are all those usual stuff like air resistance, or how you may destroy the scale etc...ie. what is the displacement during deceleration (otherwise it is probably not just 2 feet the total distance travelled) or whether deceleration is constant during that time...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
45K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K