Understanding Exergy: The Basics of Energy and its Applications

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pixel01
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of exergy, its definition, and its relationship to energy and work. Participants explore its implications in thermodynamics, particularly in the context of energy transformations and efficiency in systems like steam cycles.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant defines energy as the capacity to do work and explains that not all energy can be transformed into work, introducing the concepts of exergy (the useful part) and anergy (the unusable part).
  • Exergy loss occurs during energy transformation processes, where some exergy is converted into anergy, illustrating this with a numerical example of energy distribution.
  • The relationship between exergy, anergy, and entropy is discussed, noting that the rise in entropy corresponds to the loss of exergy.
  • Another participant refers to exergy as "availability," indicating a different terminology used in the discussion.
  • A suggestion is made to consider exergy and anergy in the study of steam cycles, advocating for the use of exergetic efficiency instead of thermal efficiency to gain insights into energy losses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions and implications of exergy and anergy, but the discussion remains open to further exploration and clarification of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the complexities of exergy and anergy in various contexts, nor does it address all assumptions related to energy transformations and efficiency metrics.

pixel01
Messages
688
Reaction score
1
Hi all
Can anyone explain the term exergy which I read recently in some textbooks. All I know is it belongs to the energy category.

Thank you.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I'll try to answer this as simple as possible (but not simpler :-) )

Ask a number of people what they assume energy is. You will have as much different answers as the number of people. So, what is energy? Well, -energy is the capacity to do work- and this is available in a lot of different forms, p.e. electrical, chemical, potential, etc. However not all energy available can be transformed into work. Only a part of it can. Why is this so? Consider therefore a heat source of some kind. This heat can be used to do work and will cool down in doing so. However it can only do this until the temperature is equal to the surrounding, not to a lower value because you would need work in getting the temperature back up. The work obtained from the heat source until the temperature of the surroundings is the amount of exergy. This is a smaller value than the energy what was available in the beginning and the difference is the anergy, the part which is unusable. So in short: energy=exergy+anergy, with exergy the usefull part and anergy the unusable part.

In the process of transforming one kind of energy into the other we have an exergy loss. This means that during the process some exergy is lost and is transformed into anergy. Assume as a simple example that you have 100J energy of which is 80J exergy and 20J anergy in the beginning. After transforming this energy to another form of energy you still have 100J at the end, but only 40J of exergy and 60J of anergy. This means that 40J of exergy is transformed into anergy. A part of the usefull energy is tranformed into unusable anergy. The fact that the energy is constant is nothing more than the first law of thermodynamics. The loss in exergy is a manifestation of the second law. The fact that there is some amount of anergy in p.e. a heat source is the reason why we can't use the energy in the sea, it is all anergy, at least to some extent. To what temperature must we cool it down, it has already the temperature of the surrounding? A mistake often made. There is energy which is (almost) completely transformable into work meaning that is has no anergy, this is electrical energy, work itself is also exergy.

Exergy and anergy are related to entropy, the amount of entropy rise is related to the loss of exergy. That's one reason why understanding entropy is so important. Be carefull in using this, the entropy can drop in a part of a system, but must always rise for the complete system, often the surroundings entropy rises more than the drop of the system's part.

Hope this clears something. There's bound to be reaction to this post :-)
 
It is also known as "availability" which is the term I am used to using.
 
Thanks Coomast, it's quite clear indeed.
 
pixel01 said:
Thanks Coomast, it's quite clear indeed.

You're welcome, glad to hear that it made things clear.

As an odd-on, in the study of p.e. steam cycles, you might consider instead of using the energy flow, also the exergy and anergy. Together with this instead of the thermal efficiency use the exergetic efficiency. This gives you an overwhelming insight in the losses in such processes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K