Angular Momentum of a particle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of angular momentum, particularly in relation to particles and bodies in motion. Participants explore the definitions, implications, and conditions under which angular momentum exists, including cases of rotational and linear motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a body rotating about a fixed axis possesses angular momentum, expressing confusion about the relationship between angular momentum and torque.
  • Another participant asserts that any rotating mass has angular momentum, providing the formula L = I ω, where I is the moment of inertia.
  • Some participants clarify that even if a mass is not rotating, it can still have angular momentum, but it may be a zero vector if it is moving in a straight line.
  • A later reply suggests that a mass moving straight can still have non-zero angular momentum with respect to a point, emphasizing the role of the position vector and linear momentum in the calculation.
  • Participants discuss the derivative of angular momentum and its relation to torque, with some clarifying that torque is the time derivative of angular momentum, not the other way around.
  • There is a debate about the assumptions made regarding the position vector and its implications for the angular momentum calculation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions under which angular momentum exists, particularly in cases of linear motion versus rotational motion. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these conditions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants assume that the position vector remains constant in certain calculations, while others challenge this assumption, indicating that the discussion involves varying interpretations of angular momentum based on different motion scenarios.

saiaspire
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Angular Momentum...

Since magnitude of the angular momentum of a particle ( or body) depends upon the linear momentum of a particle( r x p)[ p- linear momentum, r - position vector]

does it mean that a body rotating about a fixed axis( only rotational motion ) does not posses any angular momentum?

i am really confused since angular momentum is the rate of change of torque...

how is this possible... please help me...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any rotating mass has angular momentum. It's magnitude can also be given by,

[tex]L = I \omega[/tex]

where I is moment of inertia. The direction of the vector is given by the right hand rule.Try taking the derivative of the angular momentum with respect to time

[tex]L = r \times p[/tex]
 
Last edited:
what said:
Any rotating mass has angular momentum.
If mass is not rotating, it has angular momentum as well.

L = r x p
 
[tex]\frac {d}{dt} \L = r \times \frac {dp}{dt} + \frac {dr}{dt} \times p[/tex]

Usually we assume that

[tex]\frac {dr}{dt} = 0[/tex] Hence

[tex]\tau = r \times \frac {dp}{dt} = r \times F[/tex]
 
Last edited:
jdg812 said:
If mass is not rotating, it has angular momentum as well.

L = r x p

Yes, but it's a zero vector.
 
Last edited:
what said:
Yes, but it's a zero vector.
I do not think so...
If a mass does not rotate around its own center and does not rotate around other center ("O" in the picture), just moving straight, it still may have non-zero angular momentum.
 

Attachments

  • momang.gif
    momang.gif
    6 KB · Views: 498
Last edited:
Yes you are right jdg812, I kept r constant. You can zip by O in a straight light and have angular momentum with respect to O. In this case, r is a variable.

[tex]L = mvr \sin(\phi)[/tex]

As long as

[tex]\sin(\phi), p, r[/tex]

is not zero you have non-zero angular momentum.
 
Last edited:
saiaspire said:
Since magnitude of the angular momentum of a particle ( or body) depends upon the linear momentum of a particle( r x p)[ p- linear momentum, r - position vector]

OK

does it mean that a body rotating about a fixed axis( only rotational motion ) does not posses any angular momentum?

No, it doesn't mean that at all. You can view a rotating body as a collection of particles orbiting a common axis. What you do is compute the differential angular momentum for a particle in the body whose mass is dm. This gives you the angular momentum for just that one piece of the body. Then you integrate over the entire body to get the total angular momentum. Since all the particles are orbiting the axis of rotation in the same direction, the result can't possibly be zero.

i am really confused since angular momentum is the rate of change of torque...

Other way around. Torque is the time derivative of angular momentum.
 
what said:
[tex]\frac {d}{dt} \L = r \times \frac {dp}{dt} + \frac {dr}{dt} \times p[/tex]

Usually we assume that

[tex]\frac {dr}{dt} = 0[/tex]

It doesn't matter if you assume [itex]d\vec{r}/dt=0[/itex]. [itex]d\vec{r}/dt[/itex] is parallel to [itex]\vec{p}[/itex]. The cross product of any two parallel vectors is zero.
 
  • #10
thanks guys...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K