Help with accelerated coordinate system question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a ball thrown vertically upward on the Earth's surface, focusing on the effects of the Earth's rotation, specifically the centrifugal and Coriolis forces. Participants explore the derivation of an equation that predicts the distance the ball lands to the west, incorporating angular velocity and colatitude angle. The scope includes theoretical reasoning and mathematical derivation within a physics context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the problem of deriving the landing distance of a ball thrown vertically upward, incorporating centrifugal and Coriolis forces into the force equation.
  • Another participant suggests that the task may be more about derivation than solving, recommending the use of spherical polar coordinates and noting the vector nature of the force equation.
  • A participant expresses difficulty with visualizing and mathematically handling spherical coordinates, indicating they derived something similar but not exact.
  • One participant discusses the importance of choosing reasonable approximations, mentioning potential simplifications and the challenges faced when using Laplace transforms, including encountering unexpected results.
  • There is a suggestion to estimate the Coriolis effect based on average velocity, although this may lead to cancellation or zero results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to solve the problem, with multiple competing views on the level of approximation and methods to use. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the most effective way to derive the equation.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention limitations such as the complexity of spherical coordinates, the potential for errors in approximations, and the challenges of coupling equations in vector form. There are also unresolved mathematical steps related to the use of Laplace transforms.

Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
Ok, so if a ball is thrown vertically upward with velocity v on the Earth's surface. (Air resistance being neglected). I have to show that the ball lands a distance (4wsin(beta)v^3/3g^2) to the west where w is the angular velocity of the Earth's rotation and beta is the colatitude angle.

fIhave equations for the centrifugal force where Fcf=-mw x (w x r)
for the Coriolis force where Fcor=-2mw x v

and through this should be able to solve this equation which goes something like

F=mg +Fcor +Fcf where F=mass multiplied by the acceleration of coordinate system. Help anybody?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you supposed to solve or derive the equation that you have given in the first paragraph? It seems more like a derivation.

Off the top of my head, I would set it up in spherical polar coordinates. Don't forget that the equation for force that you gave is a vector equation. Basically, you will get 3 equations (that I think will be coupled). I see if I can give you more specifics if I find some time later.
 
Thanks, I have a lot of trouble with spherical coordinates and seeing 3 dimensions in my head and mathematically. I derived something sort of close looking using the vector equations I gave. Thanks for just taking a look at this anywayz.
 
It seems like this is an exercise in choosing the reasonable level of approximation. For instance, you could go all out and solve in spherical polar coordinates, which would be a complete mess. You could take it down several notches and make some approximations like r ~ r0 and θ ~ θ0 throughout the process. I tried it this way, but I think I slipped up somewhere (I used Laplace transforms; it was still a mess, and I got a zero where I don't think there should be one). Something that just occurred to me, you could estimate the coriolis effect by applying it to the average value of the velocity (but that might just cancel/give zero). I might look at my approach again and see if I can find my error.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K