Quantcast Sum of random number of random variables Text - Physics Forums Library

PDA

View Full Version : Sum of random number of random variables


fredliu
Jul31-08, 04:35 PM
Hi, Guys,
I'm new to this forum, and don't have strong background in probability theory, so please bare with me if the question is too naive.

Here's the question,

In a problem I'm trying to model, I have a random variable (say, R), which is a sum of random number (say, N) of random variables (say, Hi), in which all Hi are i.i.d..

I have distribution of both N and Hi, and I am interested in the expected value and variance of R.

Any suggestions how I can get it? My initial thought is E(R) = E(N)*E(Hi), but i feel it not quite right.. and it's even harder to have variance of R.

I did some googling, and found out ways to sum rvs, but not so much of how to find random sums..

Any suggestions? or hint about where I can find related information?

Thanks

Focus
Aug1-08, 06:54 AM
Use the tower property which says that E(E(X|Y))=E(X) . In your case the solution is E\left(\sum_{i=1}^N H_i \right)=E\left(E\left(\sum_{i=1}^N H_i | N\right)\right)=E\left(\sum_{i=1}^N E(H_i)\right)=E(N E(H_1)) . Furthermore is N and His are independent then you can say that E(R)=E(N)E(H_1) . Hope this helps.

mathman
Aug1-08, 04:34 PM
To get the variance, you can apply the same approach (as Focus) to get the second moment and then use the usual relationship between second moment and variance.

fredliu
Aug1-08, 04:47 PM
Thanks very much for all your replies, guys~~

I'll look into the suggested approach, thanks a bunch~~

pluviosilla
Aug3-08, 11:05 AM
This question is related to another, so if I may, I'd like to add it to this thread.

In my Sheldon Ross, First Course in Probability, there is a derivation that has stumped me. The author wants to show how to use the conditional variance formula

Var(X) = E[Var(X|Y)] + Var(E[X|Y])

to derive the following identity:

Var(\sum_{i = 1}^{N}X_i) = E[N]Var(X) + (E[X])^2Var(N)

but he skips some steps and succeeds in losing me. :-) All he says, by way of derivation, is that the following two statements hold:

E[\sum_{i = 1}^{N}X_i|N] = NE[X]
Var(\sum_{i = 1}^{N}X_i|N) = NVar(X)

But if I substitute these into the conditional variance formula I get:

Var(X) = E[Var(X|N)] + Var(E[X|N])
= E[NVar(X)] + Var(NE[X])
= E[N]E[Var(X)] + Var(NE[X])

In the last step, I can separate E[N] because N and X are independent, but I can think of no further simplifications. I've been looking around for a handy identity for a variance of a product, but cannot find anything.

Suggestions?

gel
Aug3-08, 03:03 PM
Var(X) = E[Var(X|N)] + Var(E[X|N])
= E[NVar(X)] + Var(NE[X])
= E[N]E[Var(X)] + Var(NE[X])

...

Suggestions?

how about using E[Var(X)]=Var(X) and Var(NE[X])=Var(N)E[X]^2?

n_bourbaki
Aug3-08, 03:12 PM
E[X] is just a number, so you have to work out the variance of a constant times N. That is standard: Var(kY)=k^2.Var(Y) for k constant and Y an r.v.

Don't forget that Var (Y)= E(Y^2) - E(Y)^2 as well, when you're doing things like this. So if U and V are independent

Var(UV)= E(U^2V^2) - E(UV)^2 = E(U^2)E(V^2) - E(U)^2E(V^2)

which can be related, albeit messily, to Var(U) and Var(V).

pluviosilla
Aug3-08, 06:55 PM
"E[X] is just a number" - Yes! Seems obvious now, but that is what I was overlooking.

I suppose we could also say that Var(X) is just a number, which explains the other identity that I overlooked: E[Var(X)] = Var(X).

Thanks very much for these helpful replies!