Quantcast From Hamiltonian to Lagrangian 1 Text - Physics Forums Library

PDA

View Full Version : From Hamiltonian to Lagrangian 1


malawi_glenn
Sep6-08, 02:59 AM
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

H = p_1p_2 + q_1q_2

Find the corresponding Lagrangian, q_i are generelized coordinates and
p_i are canonical momenta.

2. Relevant equations

H = \dot{q}_ip_i - L

p_i = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_i}

\dot{q}_i = \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_i}


3. The attempt at a solution

Using these relations, I found:


L = \dot{q}_ip_i - H

L = p_1p_2 + p_2p_1 - p_1p_2 + q_1q_2 = p_1p_2 - q_1q_2 =

\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_1}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_2}-q_1q_2

Am I supposed to solve this nasty PDE? Or have I forgot something really fundamental?

malawi_glenn
Sep6-08, 05:51 AM
I had missed something fundamental, its solved now

Herbststurm
Sep6-08, 06:14 AM
Hi,

it is only a bagatelle, but if you write the Hamilton function in generel, not for a concret case, then you schould write it like that:

\mathcal{H}(q_{1} \ldots q_{s}, p_{1} \ldots p_{s}, t) = \sum\limits_{i=1}^{s} p_{i} \dot{q}_{i} - \mathcal{L}(q_{1} \ldots q_{s}, \dot{q}_{1} \ldots \dot{q}_{s},t)

& s = 3N-m \text{ with N dimensions and m constraints}

all the best

malawi_glenn
Sep6-08, 06:17 AM
I know, I already listed that eq. under "relevant eq's".

Aslo I have solved the problem, no need to post.

Also, it seems I can't marked this thread as solved in the "old way", why is that?