Entropy change of a non-perfect gas

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alexbib
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Entropy Gas
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the entropy change of a non-perfect gas, particularly in the context of processes such as free expansion and the Joule-Thomson effect. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of entropy, including its dependence on state and process, and the implications for real gases versus ideal gases.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about how to evaluate the numerical value for the entropy change of a non-perfect gas and compares the entropy of different quantities of gas in a container.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the specific process for which the entropy change is being evaluated.
  • A participant describes the entropy change during a free expansion process where the temperature decreases due to the Joule-Thomson effect, assuming certain measurable variables.
  • One participant discusses the relationship between entropy and internal energy variations in a simple expansive system, introducing relevant equations and concepts.
  • Another participant asserts that entropy is a state function, suggesting that the change in entropy between two states is independent of the process taken to get there, and mentions using gas tables for calculations.
  • Further contributions elaborate on the idea of imagining a reversible process to calculate entropy changes, providing specific examples involving phase changes and intermediate states.
  • There is a discussion about the use of the ideal gas constant (R) versus specific heat at constant volume (Cv) in entropy equations, with some participants correcting earlier statements regarding their applicability to ideal versus real gases.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that entropy is a state function, but there is contention regarding the implications of this for non-perfect gases and the processes involved in calculating entropy changes. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on how to approach the evaluation of entropy changes.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on the definitions of processes, the assumptions made about reversibility, and the specific conditions under which the gas is evaluated. There are unresolved mathematical steps and varying interpretations of the equations presented.

alexbib
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
how could one evaluate a numerical value for the entropy change of a non-perfect gas?

Also,which system has more entropy, a container with x molecules in it, or the same container with 2x of the same molecules?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Entropy change for what process?
 
well, for example, the change in entropy for a free expansion where the temperature decreases (because gas is not ideal and the Joule-Thomson effect) (assuming you can measure Vi, Vf, Ti, Tf)
 
Working with thermal machines, entropy don't depends on material which do the cycle, almost directly... the entropy is:
[tex]dS \leq \frac{\delta Q}{T}[/tex]
being equal if the process is reversible, and less if the process is not reversible.

Well, if you work with a simple (without interchange of mass) expansive system the entropy will deppend on variations of internal energy:
[tex]TdS = dU + pdV[/tex]

In your case, the Joule-Kelvin effect:
"Change in temperature of a thermally insulated gas* when it is forced through a small hole or a porous material"
This gas must be a real gas, because ideal gas can't be detained with a porous material since its particles have not volume.

Lets have a open adiabatic recipient with a pair of adiabatic and mobile pistons, one in each side of the open recipient and in the middle we have a porous material.

When we start, the second piston is over the porous material, so all the gas is "at left". When we begin to move the left piston, the gas will be compressed and the right piston will advance to the right, letting particles move across the porous material.

At the end, the left piston will be near the porous material and all the gas will be in the right of the recipient.

Calling p1,V1,T1 the conditions of the gas when it is at left, and p2,V2,T2 at right, let's have:
From 1st. principle, we have:
[tex]\Delta U = Q - W = -W_{adiabatic}[/tex]
Because the gas crosses the tube in adiabatic conditions, so:

[tex]W = p_{1}(0-V_{1}) + p_{2}(V_{2}-0) = p_{2}V_{2} - p_{1}V_{1} = - \Delta U = - (U_{2} - U_{1})[/tex]
then...
[tex] U_{2} + p_{2}V_{2} = U_{1} + p_{1}V_{1} ...[/tex]
[tex] H_{2} = H_{1}[/tex]
So the entalpy is the same at the begin than at the end, but that process is not reversible so its not isoentalpic.

To calculate the variation of entropy in that process, we can use that entropy is an state function to build a isoentalpic process between state 1 and 2. Using the definition of entalpy (without interchange of material with the exterior, to simplify): [tex]dH = -TdS - Vdp[/tex] and because dH = 0, let's have:
[tex]TdS = Vdp[/tex]

Solving that differential equation between states 1 and 2 you will have the variation of entropy. Obviously you need the relation f(p,V,T) (that is, the thermal equation) to do.

MiGUi

(If a term is not correctly spelt or so, I'm sorry but I'm not english, I do what I can :) )
 
Last edited:
Isn't entropy a state function, so that the change of entropy of a gas between two states is independent of the process?

That being said, coming from an engineering background, if I wanted to find the change in entropy for a gas between two states, I would find some appropriate gas tables with s (specific entropy) values, and subtract s1 from s2.
 
Entropy is a state function, so it not deppends on process. Ok, being exact we must imagine a reversible process between state 1 and state 2. For example:

To calculate the variation of entropy of 1 mol of (ice) water at state 1: T = 270 K, p = 1 atm and state 2: (liquid) T = 275 K p = 1 atm we can't do it directly, because the fusion is not a reversible process, so we must imagine a reversible process like this:

We use the intermediate state "0" to avoid the change of phase consequences.

We heat water from T = 270 K to T = 273 K, the variation of entropy is:
[tex]\Delta S_{1-0} = nRln\frac{T_1}{T_2}[/tex]
Then, we give the latent heat of fusion, to melt ice... so the variation of entropy is:
[tex]\Delta S_{0} = -nL_f[/tex]
( being with - because is heat that we must give to the system)
And finally we heat from T=273 K to T = 275 K, and the variation of entropy is:
[tex]\Delta S_{0-2} = nRln\frac{T_1}{T_2}[/tex]

You can test that if you use directly the formula of the variation of entropy in a isobaric process is different from the value that we test.
 
Entropy is a state function, so it not deppends on process. Ok, being exact we must imagine a reversible process between state 1 and state 2. For example:

To calculate the variation of entropy of 1 mol of (ice) water at state 1: T = 270 K, p = 1 atm and state 2: (liquid) T = 275 K p = 1 atm we can't do it directly, because the fusion is not a reversible process, so we must imagine a process like this:

We heat water from T = 270 K to T = 273 K, the variation of entropy is:
[tex]\Delta S_{1-0} = nRln\frac{T_1}{T_2}[/tex]
Then, we give the latent heat of fusion, to melt ice... so the variation of entropy is:
[tex]\Delta S_{0} = -nL_f[/tex]
( being with - because is heat that we must give to the system)
And finally we heat from T=273 K to T = 275 K, and the variation of entropy is:
[tex]\Delta S_{0-2} = nRln\frac{T_1}{T_2}[/tex]

You can test that if you use directly the formula of the variation of entropy in a isobaric process is different from the value that we test.
 
in the last equation, R is what? the ideal gas constant? I've seen this equation before, but instead or R it was Cv
 
R is the ideal gas constant. You are right. It must be Cv instead, but that expression is only for ideal gases. I was wrong... forget the formulae then, I wanted to explain the concept without anymore.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K