PDA

View Full Version : Spring Question. Am I doing this right?


AnnieD
Oct27-08, 08:46 PM
In Fig.7-11
http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs1650/art/qb/qu/c07/pict_7_11.gif
we must apply a force of magnitude 82.0 N to hold the block stationary at x=-2.0 cm. From that position, we then slowly move the block so that our force does +8.0 J of work on the spring–block system; the block is then again stationary. What are the block's positions, in cm? ((a) positive and (b) negative)

This is what I did, but can anyone confirm if it's correct?
F = -kx
82 = -k(-2)
82 = 2k
41 = k

Convert 8J aka 8N/m to .08N/cm because the final answer has to be in cm.
U = 1/2kx^2
For positive:
82 + .08 = 1/2(41)x^2
solve for x .. 2.00cm
For negative:
82 - .08 = 1/2(41)x^2
solve for x.. 2.00cm
(has to have 3SF)

Something doesn't seem right.. maybe I messed up in converting?
Any help would be much appreciated.. thanks!

thepanda
Oct27-08, 08:49 PM
Yes... Joule is N*m, not N/m :p

AnnieD
Oct27-08, 08:51 PM
haha that would be a good start.

So does this make sense..

Convert 8J aka 8Nm to 800Ncm
U = 1/2kx^2
For positive:
82 + 800 = 1/2(41)x^2
solve for x .. 6.56cm
For negative:
800 - 82 = 1/2(41)x^2
solve for x.. 5.92cm

?

AnnieD
Oct27-08, 08:53 PM
No wait.. that doesn't make sense either.
Why would there be more N acting on a smaller area?
I'm lost!

thepanda
Oct27-08, 08:55 PM
Yeah you shouldnt be thinking about the 82 like that because it is a force, not energy, so it would not apply to that problem. You should think about the potential energy difference between the old x and the new x, that will equal the work you put in.

AnnieD
Oct27-08, 09:04 PM
PE = mgh
But there's no height.. or mass?

Is the solving for
F = -kx
82 = -k(-2)
82 = 2k
41 = k
at least correct?

I have 46min to solve this question.

thepanda
Oct27-08, 09:06 PM
ok U is the potential energy

So 1/2 k(x_new^2 - x_old^2) = 8J, you have x old so you can solve for x new.

That is for the positive work, if you have negative work the difference between the squares is flipped.

AnnieD
Oct27-08, 09:17 PM
okay.. so
8 = 1/2(41)[(x)^2 - (-2)^2)]
8 = 1/2(41)(x^2 - 4)
16 = 41x^2 - 164
180 = 41x^2
x = 2.10

And for negative:
8 = 1/2(41)[(-2)^2 - (x)^2)]
8 = 1/2(41)(4 - x^2)
16 = (41)(4-x^2)
16 = 164 - 41x^2
16 - 164 = - 41x^2
-148 = - 41x^2
x = 1.90cm


??

thepanda
Oct27-08, 09:24 PM
Yes, but keep in mind that either the positive or the negative numbers will satisfy the problem. So since it is "slowly," it is probably the closest ones that work. So if your calcs are correct, the closest positive work on the system is at x = -2.10, and the closest negative work on the system is x = -1.90.

AnnieD
Oct27-08, 09:27 PM
I tried those answers, but they're incorrect. It's an online assignment so it tells us right away whether or not we have the right answers.

thepanda
Oct27-08, 09:32 PM
did you convert the 8 J into N*cm when you did the calculations?

AnnieD
Oct27-08, 09:40 PM
8J = .08Ncm?

This is the new question.. well really the same question, just different values.
we must apply a force of magnitude 81.0 N to hold the block stationary at x=-3.0 cm. From that position, we then slowly move the block so that our force does +7.0 J of work on the spring–block system; the block is then again stationary.

okay.. so
k = 27

.07 = 1/2(27)[(x)^2 - (-3)^2)]
.07 = 1/2(27)(x^2 - 9)
.14/27 - 9 = x^2
x = -3.00

And for negative:
.07 = 1/2(27)[(-3)^2 - (x)^2)]
.07 = 1/2(27)(9 - x^2)
.14/27 - 9 = -x^2
x = 3.00

That doesn't seem right either.
I think I'm almost ready to give up. :frown:

thepanda
Oct27-08, 09:46 PM
It's 800 N*cm.

AnnieD
Oct27-08, 09:52 PM
Nope, that didn't work either.
That's okay.. I give up.

Thanks for your help! :)

thepanda
Oct27-08, 09:58 PM
Wait, what did oyu get for that second problem? I get -6.546 cm.

AnnieD
Oct27-08, 10:00 PM
Same thing.
The positive value was correct, but the negative position wasn't.
That's okay. :)