Having difficulty with this Oscillation problem

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Theelectricchild
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difficulty Oscillation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the oscillation of a uniform meter stick pivoted at one end and held horizontal by a spring. Participants explore the derivation of the frequency of oscillation, addressing aspects of torque, moment of inertia, and the effects of various forces acting on the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests writing a torque equation about the hinge but expresses difficulty in doing so, questioning the relationship between the spring constant and the frequency formula.
  • Another participant proposes a model that neglects horizontal displacement and derives a frequency formula, indicating a discrepancy with the book's answer regarding the spring constant.
  • A participant questions the reasoning behind using the term \(kL^{2}\phi\) in the torque equation, seeking clarification on the squared term's significance.
  • Concerns are raised about the moment of inertia used in the calculations, with one participant suggesting that the correct formula should involve \((1/3)ML^{2}\) instead of \((1/12)ML^{2}\), leading to a potential alignment with the book's answer.
  • Another participant provides a vector form of the spring force and calculates the torque, contributing to the discussion on the mechanics involved.
  • One participant questions why the weight of the meter stick is ignored in the torque equation, proposing an alternative torque expression that includes gravitational effects.
  • A later reply acknowledges the previous concerns about the moment of inertia and agrees that it should be \((1/3)ML^{2}\), indicating a correction to earlier claims.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct moment of inertia to use in the calculations, with some supporting the use of \((1/12)ML^{2}\) and others advocating for \((1/3)ML^{2}\). There is also debate regarding the inclusion of the weight of the meter stick in the torque equation. Overall, the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their assumptions regarding the axis of rotation and the effects of gravitational forces, which may influence the accuracy of their calculations and conclusions.

Theelectricchild
Messages
260
Reaction score
0
This question is quite interesting:

A uniform meter stick of mass M is pivoted on a hinge at one end and held horizontal by a spring with spring constant k attached at the other end. If the stick oscillates up and down slightly, what is it's frequency? The length of the stick is one meter.

My thoughts: I believe I should write a torque equation about the hinge, but I am having difficulty doing that--- any suggestions?

Also and I f=[(k/M)^.5]/2pi but the back of the book has 3k where I have k. I don't understand how they get this. Thanks a lot for your help!

Also if you need a picture ill be happy to draw one out --- thanks again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clearly, as the rod rotates an angle [tex]\phi[/tex] about the hinge, there is a slight horizontal displacement of the rod (and spring) as well.
In the following, I neglect this displacement component, and model the problem with a pure vertical displacement.
If the displacement angle is [tex]\phi[/tex] then the associated vertical displacement of the tip of the rod (fixed to the spring) is [tex]L\phi[/tex] where L is the length of the rod (to the order of accuracy indicated).

The moment of inertia about the hinge must be: [tex]I=\frac{ML^{2}}{12}[/tex]
We gain thus:
[tex]kL^{2}\phi+\frac{ML^{2}}{12}\frac{d^{2}\phi}{dt^{2}}=0\to\omega^{2}=12\frac{k}{M}[/tex]

Since [tex]f=\frac{\omega}{2\pi}[/tex] we have:
[tex]f=\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3k}{M}}}{\pi}[/tex]

The factor 2 in the denominator in the book is wrong.
 
Ahh thank you much I understand all--- I know it's essential to solve the problem but WHY exactly do we use the [tex]kL^{2}\phi[/tex] ?--- or I should ask--- why is it "squared"? I am always quite good at solving and getting the correct answer, but not understanding why equations work can be quite annoying.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Uh oh i may have found a problem:

if you're just using (1/12)M*L^2, wouldn't you be saying that the axis of rotation WAS at the hinge which is at the END of the rod because you're using L which is the length of the rod? so wouldn't you use the (1/3)M*L^2? can you explain this one to me, ald.?

Interesting because if we use 1/3 then we end up getting the answer in the back which COULD be right?

Thanks!
 
In vector form, the spring force is [tex]\vec{F}=-kL\phi\vec{j}[/tex]
The arm from the hinge to the tip is, to same order of accuracy: [tex]\vec{r}=L\vec{i}[/tex]

Hence, we get the torque:[tex]\vec{r}\times\vec{F}=-kL^{2}\phi\vec{k}[/tex]
 
Theelectricchild said:
Uh oh i may have found a problem:

if you're just using (1/12)M*L^2, wouldn't you be saying that the axis of rotation WAS at the hinge which is at the END of the rod because you're using L which is the length of the rod? so wouldn't you use the (1/3)M*L^2? can you explain this one to me, ald.?

Interesting because if we use 1/3 then we end up getting the answer in the back which COULD be right?

Thanks!

You're right! Of course it should be 1/3 rather than 1/12. Sorry for that
 
Ahh thanks again! You help people out so much on this site and I do appreciate that.
 
I'm solving this exact same problem at the moment. Question: Why is the weight of the meter stick being ignored in the torque equation. Shouldn't the torque equation be:

[tex]\tau = -\frac{1}{2}LMg - kL^2\phi[/tex]
 
At a glance, I believe you're right.
Anyways (as I'm sure you're aware of), this wouldn't affect the frequency (which is what they want)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K