View Full Version : proof
a.katerina
Mar26-09, 03:33 PM
Hi,
i have just registered to the forum, because this time i study number theory and in some problems i can't figure out how to solve them.
This time i have to prove: If two integers x,y doesn't divided with 3 then the (x^2 - y^2) always is divided with 3.
Does any one has a clue how to start?
Thank you!
Office_Shredder
Mar26-09, 03:37 PM
Break it up into what x and y modulo 3 can be (so four cases)
a.katerina
Mar26-09, 03:51 PM
what?? Can you explain it a little bit, please?
HallsofIvy
Mar26-09, 06:07 PM
If x is not divisible by 3 then it can be written as x= 3k+1 or 3k+2 for some integer k.
If y is not divisible by 3 then it can be written as y= 3j+1 or 3j+2 for some integer k.
That gives 4 cases to consider:
1) x= 3k+1 and y= 3j+1.
2) x= 3k+1 and y= 3j+2.
3) x= 3k+2 and y= 3j+1.
4) x= 3k+2 and y= 3j+2.
Calculate x^2- y^2 for each of those cases.
ramsey2879
Mar26-09, 08:36 PM
If x is not divisible by 3 then it can be written as x= 3k+1 or 3k+2 for some integer k.
If y is not divisible by 3 then it can be written as y= 3j+1 or 3j+2 for some integer k.
That gives 4 cases to consider:
1) x= 3k+1 and y= 3j+1.
2) x= 3k+1 and y= 3j+2.
3) x= 3k+2 and y= 3j+1.
4) x= 3k+2 and y= 3j+2.
Calculate x^2- y^2 for each of those cases.
Since +/- 0 = 0 are not cases 2 and 3 equivalent?
Since 2 = -1 and -1*-1 = 1 , (-1)^2 = (+1)^2 are not cases 1 and 4 equivalent?
Even better you can rewrite each term of an expression mod n before evaluating the expression mod n. Thus each of the terms can be rewriten mod 3 by substituting 0 for 3n and 1 for -1^2 (or 2^2) to get the equivalent expressions 1-1 = 0 mod 3 which is clearly correct.
a.katerina
Apr1-09, 07:16 PM
Thank you very much for the help!! I'm grateful to you!
vBulletin® v3.7.6, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.