Electric field of infinite plane

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the electric field produced by an infinite plane of charge, exploring why the field does not depend on the distance from the plane (r). Participants examine both mathematical derivations and intuitive explanations, considering implications of the infinite nature of the plane.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Omri questions why the electric field of an infinite plane is independent of distance (r) and mentions its value as two πσ.
  • One participant explains that the field lines from an infinite plane are straight and do not spread out, unlike those from a point charge, leading to a constant field strength at any distance.
  • A mathematical explanation is provided, referencing the behavior of a solid disc as its radius approaches infinity, resulting in a specific electric field strength.
  • Another participant suggests searching for "Gauss law infinite plane" for various approaches to understanding the concept.
  • A participant notes the two-dimensional invariance of the problem, stating that the electric field cannot depend on the x or y dimensions due to the infinite nature of the plane.
  • One participant mentions that the derivation using Gauss's Law shows the electric field is independent of the z dimension, providing both a mathematical and intuitive perspective.
  • Omri challenges the intuitive explanation by comparing it to the electric field of an infinite wire, which does depend on location.
  • Another participant agrees with Omri's challenge, noting that the field lines from a line charge also spread out, suggesting that moving laterally changes the 'view' of the field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the intuitive understanding of electric fields from infinite structures, particularly comparing the infinite plane to an infinite wire. There is no consensus on the validity of the intuitive arguments presented.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the dimensionality and behavior of electric fields are not fully explored, and the discussion includes various approaches without resolving the differences in understanding between infinite planes and wires.

omri3012
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Hallo,

Why does the field of a infinite plane does not depend on r? i know it's equal to

two [tex]\pi\sigma[/tex] but why does his "infinite" makes it independent on r?

thanks

Omri
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hallo Omri! :smile:

(have a pi: π and a sigma: σ :wink:)
omri3012 said:
Why does the field of a infinite plane does not depend on r? i know it's equal to

two [tex]\pi\sigma[/tex] but why does his "infinite" makes it independent on r?

The field lines from a point charge spread out, so the field decreases with increasing distance.

But the field lines from an infinite plane are straight, and don't spread out, so the field is the same at any distance. :smile:
 
The math for field strength from a solid disc is explained here:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/electric/elelin.html#c3

as [tex]R^2 \ \rightarrow \infty[/tex]

then [tex]\frac{z} {\sqrt{z^2 + R^2}} \ \rightarrow \ 0[/tex]

and you end up with [tex]E_z = k \ \sigma \ 2 \ \pi[/tex]

An alterative approach is to consider the field from an infinitely long line (= 1/z), then integrate an infinitely large plane composed of infinitely long rectangles that approach infinitely long lines as their width approaches zero.
 
Last edited:
thanks everyone,

it was very helpful.
 
You can do a web search for "Gauss law infinite plane" and see a few various approaches for this.
 
One thing to note is that the problem is invariant in two-dimensions. If the plane lies in the x-y plane, then you know right away that the field cannot rely on x or y since the source is infinite and invariant along those directions. So all you need to do is convince yourself that the resulting fields will also be invariant with regards to z, the remaining dimension. Jeff's post is good for showing this part.
 
The 'math' answer: The derivation of the field strength, using Gauss's Law, shows that the Electric Field is independent of z. Not a very satisfying answer, but a truthful one.

The Intuitive Answer: Imagine you are a point charge hovering in a balloon over an infinite plane of charge. The plane extends infinitely, as far as the eye can see, in every direction below you. The view will be exactly the same, no matter how close or far you are from the plane. In fact, for a blank, empty, infinite plane with no points of reference on it, you will have no way of telling how far from the plane you are from where you sit in your balloon.
 
about the ituitive answer, i can claim the same argument over aninfinite wire but is field does depend on location.
 
omri3012 said:
about the ituitive answer, i can claim the same argument over aninfinite wire but is field does depend on location.

he he :biggrin:

(the field lines from a line charge also spread out)

omri3012 1

JazzFusion 0 :wink:
 
  • #10
tiny-tim said:
(the field lines from a line charge also spread out)
...so if you move laterally away from the line charge, the 'view' changes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
950
Replies
92
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
838
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K