View Full Version : Group theory, isomorphism
mathmadx
Oct16-09, 02:29 PM
Let G be a finite group. For all elements of G (the following holds: g^2=e(the idendity.) So , all except the idendity have order two.
Proof that G is isomorphic to a finite number of copies of Z_2 ( the group of adittion mod 2, Z_2 has only two elements (zero and one).)
I can try to tell you what I have already tried, but please, can someone give a hint in the right direction..? I basically need a bijection from G to (Z_2)^m, but no idea how I can do it( In particular: they should have the same size as they are finite.)
icantadd
Oct16-09, 03:30 PM
Define \phi : G \rightarrow Z_2 , so that it is forced to be surjective; i.e. tell the identity where to go. Show \phi is a hom. Then look at the kernel. There is only one possibility.
mathmadx
Oct16-09, 04:26 PM
I am sorry, I am not able to see it. I keep on thinking about the fact that m products of Z_2 has order 2^m, which is supposed to be equal to n( the order of the group G..)
I dont even get your advice: How can we tell the identity where to go!? The identity(of G) should always go to idendity(of Z_2). ..
Sorry, I am confused...
mathmadx
Oct18-09, 05:11 PM
No one who can provide some insights..?
icantadd
Oct21-09, 11:43 AM
No one who can provide some insights..?
Show the group is isomorphic to Z_2 \times Z_2 \times \ldots , so
G must be commutative since it is the case that forall g, g = g^{-1} (since gg=1)
In particular, ab = (ab)^{-1} = b^{-1}a^{-1} = ba (by assumption) So that G is commutative.
Next, you could use the fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups, says that any abelian finite group is isomorphic to Z_{m_1} \times Z_{m_2} \times \ldots
Next, look to intuitionize what is happening, look at subgroups generated by a single non identity element. There will be the |G|- 1 of them and they will all have order 2. There is only one group of order 2 up to isomorphism. What is the next step?
mathmadx
Oct21-09, 12:24 PM
We know by cauchy that the order of G is in the form 2^k. Applying this combined with the fundamental theorem is the proof.
vBulletin® v3.7.6, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.