hey if lim (x-->0) f(x) = L
where 0 < |x| < d1 implies |f(x) - L | < e
how do i prove lim (x --> 0) f(ax) = L?
i know
0 < |ax| < |a|d1
d2 = |a|d1
but the textbook says d2 = d1/|a|
help you guyssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
Office_Shredder
Nov4-09, 07:05 PM
You get to choose what d2 is
Quantumpencil
Nov5-09, 08:41 PM
You know that the function f is continuous, so you know that given epsilon > 0, there exists an delta > 0 satisfying
d(x)<delta -> d(f(x),l))<epsilon. Now your problem asks you to show that, given an epsilon > 0, you can find a delta such that d(x)<delta -> d(f(ax),l)<epsilon.
The point is that, you can also choose such a delta for ax. the continuity of the f immediately tells you that you can choose such a delta. What if f were the function f(x) = x^3? consider a neighborhood of f(x)=l=0, (-8,8). Then if x is between -2,2, we know that this relation holds. However, f(ax), a = 5, gives us a drastically stretched function. (-8, 8) is stretched to (-40, 40). if x is between -2/5, 2/5 = original delta/a, then d (f(ax), l) < d(f(x),l)<epsilon, because d(x) is now less than the first delta (2) in this case (because f(ax), x<delta over a implies that x from our second delta neighborhood, times a, is in our first delta neighborhood Adapt, and you'll be done.
vBulletin® v3.7.6, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.