Thermal Question, I seem to be doing something wrong

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brianjw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating thermal conductivity using the formula H = Area*k*(T_h - T_c)/L, where the user attempts to determine the thermal conductivity (k) of a metal rod. The user calculated the heat required to melt 7.80g of ice using Q = m*L, resulting in 2605.2 J. However, errors were identified in unit conversions, specifically treating temperature differences and heat flow rates, which should be in J/sec instead of J/min. The correct approach requires consistent unit usage and accurate temperature conversions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal conductivity and the formula H = Area*k*(T_h - T_c)/L
  • Knowledge of unit conversions, particularly between Celsius and Kelvin
  • Familiarity with heat transfer concepts and calculations
  • Ability to perform dimensional analysis for consistency in units
NEXT STEPS
  • Review thermal conductivity calculations and the significance of units in physics
  • Learn about heat transfer principles, specifically conduction and the Fourier's law
  • Study the conversion of temperature scales, focusing on Celsius, Kelvin, and Fahrenheit
  • Explore practical examples of thermal conductivity in materials science and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and materials science who are involved in thermal analysis and heat transfer calculations.

Brianjw
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Well I swear I am doing this right but something seems that its the wrong answer as the website I enter it into is rejecting it. If you see a flaw in my methods let me know:

The two ends of an insulated metal rod are maintained at a temperature differential of 100 degrees C . The rod has a length of 73.3 cm and a cross-sectional area of 1.06 cm^2. The heat conducted by the rod melts a mass of 7.80g of ice in a time of 11.3 min

So what I did was first find the amount of energy required to melt the ice without changing the temperature which uses Q = m*L

therefore:

[tex].0078kg * 3.34 * 10^5 J/Kg = 2605.2[/tex]

then I use the formula:

[tex]H = Area*k*(T_h - T_c)/L[/tex]

I need to find k for the answer in terms of W/m*k

So since H = dQ/dt I get, 2605.2/11.3 = 230.549
Using the above formula and converting celsius to Kelvin I have:

[tex]230.549J/min = .000106 m^2 * k * 373.15K/.733m^2[/tex]

which gives me approx 4270. Can anyone see where I went wrong?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Brianjw said:
Using the above formula and converting celsius to Kelvin I have:

[tex]230.549J/min = .000106 m^2 * k * 373.15K/.733m^2[/tex]
For some reason you treated the temperature difference as if it were a temperature that needed converting. No need to "convert": 100 C-degrees = 100 K-degrees.

Another problem: measure heat flow in J/sec, not J/min.
 
for sharing your approach and calculations. It seems like your method and calculations are correct, but there may be a few potential areas where things could have gone wrong. Here are a few things to consider:

1. Make sure you are using the correct units throughout your calculations. In your first equation, you used J/kg as the unit for specific latent heat, but in the second equation, you used J/min as the unit for heat transfer rate. Make sure to convert all units to the same system before plugging them into equations.

2. Double check your cross-sectional area. In the second equation, you used 0.000106 m^2, but in the given information, the cross-sectional area is 1.06 cm^2. Make sure to convert the units to the same system before using them in calculations.

3. Check your conversion from Celsius to Kelvin. In the second equation, you used 373.15 K, but that is the conversion from Celsius to Fahrenheit, not Kelvin. The correct conversion is simply adding 273.15 to the Celsius temperature.

4. Lastly, make sure to check your final answer and see if it makes sense. In this case, the value of 4270 for thermal conductivity seems a bit high. It may be worth double checking your calculations to see if there was a mistake somewhere.

I hope this helps! Good luck with your calculations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
15K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K