Confirming fact about potential energy of each particle in a fluid

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential energy of particles in a fluid contained within a cylinder on Earth. Participants explore the relationship between gravitational potential energy, pressure, and the behavior of particles in a fluid, including how these factors influence velocity and energy conservation in different contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the potential energy of each particle in a fluid is identical due to the increasing weight experienced by particles at greater depths.
  • Others argue that gravitational potential increases with height, questioning the initial claim about uniform potential energy.
  • One participant suggests that the pressure at the bottom of the cylinder contributes to potential energy, leading to confusion about how potential energy varies with depth.
  • Another participant clarifies that pressure is a thermodynamic variable and does not directly contribute to potential energy, which is defined in terms of conservative forces like gravity.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between potential energy and velocity, with one participant asserting that in a fluid, the kinetic energy of particles is influenced by interactions beyond just gravitational potential.
  • One participant introduces Bernoulli's equation to discuss the total mechanical energy of particles in an ideal fluid, emphasizing that energy remains constant regardless of height under certain conditions.
  • Another participant speculates on the behavior of particles when an orifice is opened, suggesting that particles at lower depths will initially accelerate more due to the weight of particles above them, but will eventually reach a constant velocity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the relationship between potential energy, pressure, and particle behavior in a fluid. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the initial claim about uniform potential energy or the role of pressure.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the definitions of potential energy and pressure, as well as the assumptions underlying the application of Bernoulli's equation in different fluid conditions.

dE_logics
Messages
742
Reaction score
0
I just want to confirm this fact -

Referring to a point in a cylinder on earth, filled with a fluid; the potential energy of each particle in that cylinder is identical.Reason being the weight experienced by each particle increases as we goto more depths.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The gravitational potential increases with height. Am I missing something?
 
What do you mean by the "weight experienced by each particle"? The weight of the particles above it? That has nothing to do with potential energy.
 
HallsofIvy said:
What do you mean by the "weight experienced by each particle"? The weight of the particles above it? That has nothing to do with potential energy.

So I think I'm wrong about this.

There's lots of pressure on the lower part of the cylinder so each particle should contain lots of potential energy due to the pressure.

So potential energy of the particle decreases as we move towards the bottom part of the cylinder?

If I'm wrong in the main question I think this will be it, but this will again generate a series of doubts...
 
There is no potential energy due to pressure. Pressure is a thermodynamic variable, not a force, and you can only define potentials in terms of a conservative force field (for example, gravity gives you the gravitational potential).

The potential energy does decrease, but only because it is getting closer to the Earth.
 
If the potential energy does decrease, then the velocity of the particle which's x cm (perpendicular) from the orifice should be less than the particle at a height x + a (where a is a reasonable positive integer) since only the potential energy of the particle gets converted to kinetic (velocity).

But this does not happen...in ideal conditions the velocity of all particles are the same.
 
The relation between potential energy and velocity is applicable for a single particle moving under only the interaction of the field responsible for that potential energy, so PE + KE = constant in this case.

In the case of many particles in a fluid the kinetic energy of a particle (therefore velocity) will be changed many times a second by collisions, essentially interactions with a different field (electric), to which the gravitational potential is independent, so you can no longer say KE + PE = constant because you have a second potential field due to electrostatic repulsion.

The gravitational potential is still purely a function of distance from the centre of mass of the Earth, and does not couple to the electric potential which dominates particle velocity distributions in a fluid, especially in hydrostatic equilibrium where there is no net movement up or down of the particles due to gravity.

This is what I think, anyway, there may well be a better explanation out there.
 
Pressure energy = pressure x volume. Gravitational potential energy = gravitational potential x mass. If the volume and mass for each particle of fluid is known, you can multiply Bernoulli equation by mass where the total energy per particle in an ideal fluid (incompressable) is constant regardless of height. If the fluid is compressable, then the relationship between volume and mass changes and Bernoulli equation has to be modified to use an integral form for the pressure term.

Bernoulli equation for ideal fluid: pressure/density + g h + 1/2 v2 = constant

(pressure x volume) + m g h + 1/2 m v2 = total mechanical energy = constant

Assuming v = 0 you get:

(pressure x volume) + m g h = constant

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli_principle
 
Last edited:
Consider only a situation where the fluid is under influence of a field which is not a function of distance (can be considered sorts of equal to the situation on Earth where the height of the apparatus is not reaching the sky...).

If orifice is opened, the particles at the lower part of the cylinder will initially accelerate more in comparative to the particles above them (cause the weight of the parciles above will act on the particles below), then the acceleration should reduce to a constant since G will pull each particle in an identical way...this is what I think will happen.

All this should result in all particles gaining a constant velocity regardless of their initial position in the cylinder...and we practically see this.

Am I right about this in the assumed field?

Jeff Reid said:
pressure energy = pressure x volume. Gravitational potential energy = gravitational potential x mass. If the volume and mass for each particle of fluid is known, you can multiply Bernoulli equation by mass where the total energy per particle in an ideal fluid (incompressable) is constant regardless of height. If the fluid is compressible, then the relationship between volume and mass changes and Bernoulli equation has to be modified to use an integral form for the pressure term.

Bernoulli equation for ideal fluid: pressure/density + g h + 1/2 v2 = constant

(pressure x volume) + m g h + 1/2 m v2 = total mechanical energy = constant

Assuming v = 0 you get:

(pressure x volume) + m g h = constant

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli_principle

Yes, exactly what I was saying.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K