Stuck on taking the integral of

  • Thread starter Thread starter carlchen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Stuck
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the integral from 0 to 3 of the expression (1 + [1/2x^(1/2) - 1/2x^(-1/2)]^2)^(1/2) dx, which appears to present challenges in simplification and integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to simplify the expression by foiling the squared term and considering a substitution method, but expresses frustration with the process. Other participants suggest re-evaluating the algebraic manipulation, with one participant providing an alternative expression derived from the original.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different algebraic approaches to simplify the integral. Some guidance has been offered regarding algebraic manipulation, but there is no clear consensus on the next steps or the correctness of the derived expressions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of algebraic skills in solving calculus problems, indicating a broader context of interconnected mathematical competencies. There is a sense of uncertainty regarding the accuracy of the transformations being discussed.

carlchen
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
from 0 to 3, ( 1 + [ 1/2x^(1/2) - 1/2x^(-1/2) ]^2 )^(1/2) dx

I started to foil the ^2 term and then tryed to use the u sub, but It doesn't seem to work out. this problem is killing me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try that again! ((1/2)x1/2- (1/2)x-1/2)1/2=
(1/4)x- 1/2+ (1/4)x-1.

Now, when you add 1 to that you get (1/4)x+ 1/2+ (1/4)x-1. In other words, exactly the same thing except with +1/2 instead of -1/2!

Now that = (what?)2.
 
I think HallsofIvy is saying mess about with the algebra. I did and in a few steps got:

[tex]\frac{1}{2} \int_0^3 x^{\frac{1}{2}} + x^{-\frac{1}{2}} dx[/tex]

But I am not 100% confident on my skills so don't just copy that down.
 
Another proof that you need to be good at algebra in order to be good at calculus.
 
e(ho0n3 said:
Another proof that you need to be good at algebra in order to be good at calculus.

And you have to be good at calculus to be good at differential equations- and you have to be good at differential equations to be good at analysis, It just keeps going!
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K