Calculating Potential from 3 Charges Placed on a Line

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential from a system of three charges arranged linearly: +q, -2q, and +q, each separated by a distance 'a'. The original poster seeks to show that the potential at a point far from the charges can be approximated by a specific formula involving the cosine of an angle and the distance from the charges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the electric field generated by the charge configuration and its relation to the potential. There are attempts to simplify expressions involving vectors and distances to the charges. Questions arise regarding the correctness of the electric field calculations and the implications for the potential derived from them.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest alternative methods for calculating the potential directly from point charges, while others express confusion about obtaining the expected form of the potential. There is recognition of algebraic errors and the need for approximations, with some guidance offered on using Taylor expansions for simplification.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of approximating the potential as the distance becomes large compared to the separation 'a', and the discussion includes considerations of how terms in the potential should behave in this limit.

kreil
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
665
Reaction score
68

Homework Statement


Three charges +q, -2q, +q are placed on a line with equal separation a. Show that the potential at a point far away from the charges is approximately given by:

[tex]\Phi(r, \theta)=\frac{a^2q^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{3cos^2 \theta-1}{r^3}[/tex]

Homework Equations


E-Field due to the discrete distribution of charges:
[tex]E(r)=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \sum_{i=1}^3 q_i \frac{r-r_i}{|r-r_i|^3}[/tex]

where r is the vector to the point where we want the field and r_i is the vector to charge q_i.

Potential:
[tex]\Phi(r)=-\int_O^rE \dot dr[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Position the charges such that the -2q is at the origin, and the +q charges are at +-a on the x -axis. Then the vectors to the charges are:

charge at +a: [tex]|r-a|=\sqrt{r^2+a^2-2racos\theta}=r(1-cos^2\theta)^{1/2}[/tex] since a = r cos O.

charge at -a: [tex]|r+a|=\sqrt{4a^2+r^2+a^2+2racos\theta}=r(1+3cos^2\theta)^{1/2}[/tex]

charge at origin: r=0.

So the field at r is:

[tex]E(r)=\frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left[ \frac{r-a}{|r-a|^3}+\frac{r+a}{|r+a|^3}-\frac{2r}{|r|^3} \right][/tex]

[tex]= \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left[ \frac{r(1-cos^2 \theta)^{1/2}}{r^3(1-cos^2\theta)^{3/2}}+\frac{r(1+3cos^2\theta)^{1/2}}{r^3(1+3cos^2\theta)^{3/2}}-\frac{2}{r^2} \right][/tex]

[tex]= \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{r^2} \left[ \frac{1}{1-cos^2\theta}+\frac{1}{1+3cos^2\theta}-2 \right][/tex]

is this correct so far? After further simplifying this answer I obtained an equation for the field which seemingly does not produce a correct potential (I'm aware I will have to take the limit of the potential). Intuitively this field seems incorrect since the potential relies on 1/r^3 (i.e. the e-field should rely on 1/r^4 since the potential is the integrated e-field).

Thanks for any comments.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ignoring the fact that i made many gross errors in the original post, the expression I'm trying to simplify now is:

[tex]E(\vec r)= \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \left[ \frac{\vec r + \vec a}{|\vec r + \vec a|^3}+\frac{\vec r - \vec a}{|\vec r - \vec a|^3}-\frac{2 \vec r}{|\vec r|^3} \right][/tex]

with the following:

[tex]|\vec r + \vec a| = \sqrt{r^2+a^2+2racos \theta}[/tex]

[tex]|\vec r - \vec a| = \sqrt{r^2+a^2-2racos \theta}[/tex]

I'm having a lot of trouble simplifying this because I'm out of practice with vectors, and I'm sure that it is not nearly as difficult as I am making it out to be (after 20 minutes of combining into one fraction and simplifying I decided it can't be the best method). Can someone give a hint?

[tex]E(\vec r)= \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{1}{r^3} \left[ \frac{\vec r + \vec a}{(1+\frac{a^2}{r^2}+\frac{2a}{r}cos \theta)^{3/2}}+\frac{\vec r - \vec a}{(1+\frac{a^2}{r^2}-\frac{2a}{r}cos \theta)^{3/2}}-2 \vec r \right][/tex]
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Why are you calculating the electric field first? Save yourself some trouble and just use the fact that the potential due to a point charge [itex]q[/itex] located at [itex]\textbf{r}'[/itex] is given by

[tex]\Phi=\frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{1}{|\textbf{r}-\textbf{r}'|}[/tex] (Taking infinity as the reference point)

This allows you to calculate the exact potential with ease. Then, simply use your favorite method for approximating a function (Taylor expansion perhaps) to see what the approximate potential is far from the origin.
 
you make a good point, thanks.
 
using that method i get a potential that relies on 1/r for r>>a..how in the world am i supposed to obtain a potential that relies on 1/r^3??
 
The terms proportional to 1/r should cancel out. You probably made an algebraic error.
 
I am missing something substantial here.

[tex]\phi( \vec r) = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \sum_{i=1}^N \frac{1}{|\vec r - \vec r_i|}[/tex]

So for this charge dist.

[tex]\phi( \vec r) = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \left[ \frac{1}{|\vec r - \vec a|} + \frac{1}{|\vec r + \vec a|}-\frac{2}{|\vec r|} \right][/tex][tex]\phi( \vec r) = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \left[ \frac{1}{\sqrt{r^2+a^2-2racos \theta}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{r^2+a^2+2racos \theta}}-\frac{2}{r} \right][/tex][tex]\phi( \vec r) = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac{1}{r} \left[ \frac{(1+\frac{a^2}{r^2}-\frac{2a}{r} cos \theta)^{1/2}+(1+\frac{a^2}{r^2}+\frac{2a}{r} cos \theta)^{1/2}-(1+\frac{2a^2}{r^2}+\frac{a^4}{r^4}-\frac{4a^2}{r^2}cos^2 \theta)^{1/2}}{(1+\frac{2a^2}{r^2}+\frac{a^4}{r^4}-\frac{4a^2}{r^2} cos^2 \theta)^{1/2}} \right][/tex]

I must have been doing this part incorrectly. At this point, what is the best way to approximate these terms? Does a taylor expansion work even though we want [itex]r \rightarrow \infty[/itex] after the approximation?
 
r is large compared to [itex]a^2\pm2ra\cos\theta[/itex], so factor it out of the radical to get
[tex]\frac{1}{r\sqrt{1+[(a/r)^2\pm2(a/r)\cos\theta]}}[/tex],

expand the square root as a Taylor series in powers of [itex][(a/r)^2\pm2(a/r)\cos\theta][/itex], and collect terms in powers of r. This will give you a well-known result involving Legendre polynomials. If you already know what that result is, it can save you some time and quite a bit of algebra if you go straight to it.
 
that helped enormously, just finished the problem. thanks a ton!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K