Momentum and Kinetic Energy of stationary ball collision

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the collision dynamics between two balls, where one ball (mass m1) is in motion and the other (mass m2) is stationary. It establishes that in an elastic collision, when the mass of the stationary ball (m2) decreases slightly, the total kinetic energy gained by m2 after the collision increases. This conclusion is derived from the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy principles, specifically in a one-dimensional collision scenario. The analysis utilizes the center of mass reference frame to illustrate how changes in mass affect the velocities and kinetic energies of both balls post-collision.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elastic collision principles
  • Knowledge of conservation of momentum and kinetic energy
  • Familiarity with center of mass reference frame
  • Basic algebra for solving equations with two unknowns
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the equations of conservation of momentum and kinetic energy in elastic collisions
  • Learn about the center of mass reference frame and its applications in collision analysis
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of collisions as described by Huygens
  • Investigate the effects of mass variations on kinetic energy in collision scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of momentum and kinetic energy in collision dynamics.

chrizzle
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
if a ball of mass, m is traveling at v and it hits a stationary ball that is a much larger mass (ignoring air resistance, friction etc.) through algebra how would you show that when the mass of the stationary ball decreases slightly, the total kinetic energy that the stationary ball gains after the collision increases. (it is assumed that it is an elastic collision ie. kinetic energy is conserved)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write down the equations of both cases and divide them like in a two equations 2 unknowns gig. Might work in this case.
 
It is important to remember the following to understand this solution to the question.
1. We take into consideration, the conservation of momentum, besides kinetic energy (KE) conservation.
2. We assume the collision to be 1D collision; ie, it is a head-on collision and NOT an oblique collision. This assumption avoids the complications that are associated with elastic scatter process, which is not same as elastic collision process.
3. In the center of mass(CM) reference frame, the velocity of CM is zero. each mass changes the sign of its velocity (but not magnitude), after the collision thereby conserving its KE.
4. In the laboratory reference frame (where one of the masses is at rest before collision), CM moves with a velocity equal in magnitude and opposite in sign to that of the velocity with which the mass at rest would move when the collision is viewed in CM frame. (This gives the reason why the mass at rest appears to be at rest in the laboratory frame).

Now the answer to the question:

When the body (say, m2), at rest before collision decreases its mass slightly, the velocity of CM increases slightly (compared to the value it had when the masses were equal), in order that m2 appears to be at rest.

After the collision the velocity of CM remains the same. Velocity of the mass m2 increases (compared to the value it had after the collision when the masses were equal); consequently, KE of m2 increases when its mass decreases.

The other body, (m1) (which came to rest(zero velocity) after the collision when the masses were equal) moves with a non-zero velocity. Consequently, its KE also increases compared to the value it had (zero) when the masses were equal).

The solution is very simple in the geometrical form (and is due to Huygens). The algebraic solution can be obtained by solving the equations of conservation of mass, momentum and KE.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K