Generators: Water instead of a coil?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter misogynisticfeminist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coil Generators Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the concept of using water as a conductor in generators instead of traditional coils. Participants consider the feasibility of relying on convection currents or water waves to generate electricity, examining both theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose using impure water as a conductor, suggesting that convection currents or water waves could power a generator.
  • Others argue that water cannot effectively replace coils due to its lower conductivity compared to metals like copper, and express skepticism about the amount of current that could be generated.
  • A participant suggests that water could act similarly to a coil by moving through a magnetic field, though they acknowledge uncertainty about the engineering aspects.
  • Some mention existing research into magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) propulsion systems, noting that while there is interest in MHD generators, they are not widely adopted for seawater.
  • Concerns are raised about the limitations of using water, including issues with vaporization and the need for ions to conduct electricity.
  • Participants discuss the conductivity of metals compared to water, with some noting that metals can be made superconductive when cooled, unlike water.
  • One participant introduces the idea of generating electricity from temperature differences in ocean water, referencing experimental work done near Hawaii.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the viability of using water in generators, with no consensus reached on the effectiveness or practicality of this approach.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on water's ionic content for conductivity, the challenges of maintaining water in a generator without vaporization, and the unresolved engineering questions surrounding the proposed concepts.

misogynisticfeminist
Messages
370
Reaction score
0
Yea, I just had a pretty weird idea, can we instead use water instead of a coil since water is a conductor as well (impure water that is.). Can we instead rely on convection currents or water waves to power this generator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I not sure I understand...are you saying we should use water with electrolytes instead of a coil of wire in the generators? How do you expect the water to help produce greater electricity if you can't even coil it. Having the coil move through the magnetic field can generate a lot more power than electrolites in water. Besides, copper for example is a lot more conductive than water with ions.
 
Actually, I'm saying that the water acts as a coil in a conventional generator, and the movement of the water actually cuts the magnetic field which induces a current in the water. I'm not sure exactly how, and have no idea how a system using this thing I thought can be engineered yet, but is it theoretically sound?
 
Perhaps a different use for hydroelectric dams? The motion of the water is supplied by the current?
 
Where would you put the water?

And, how will you avoid water vaporization?.

I could help you more if you explicit it more geometrically (i.e water flowing).
 
Using water in place of a coil is a terrible idea. Generators work by spinning a roter in the magnetic field of permanent magnets. The rotor has a coil of conductive wire, and as a conductor is moved through the magnetic field by spinning, it causes the flow of electrons in the conductor, which is a current. Using water to move through the magnetic field wouldn't give nearly the same amount of current, I am not even sure if ANY current would be produced. Although some current should be produced if the water has electrolytes in it, but once again I am not too sure.
 
misogynisticfeminist said:
Yea, I just had a pretty weird idea, can we instead use water instead of a coil since water is a conductor as well (impure water that is.). Can we instead rely on convection currents or water waves to power this generator?

There's some research into magnetohydrodynamic propulsion for ships, using seawater. For instance

http://www.sanu.ac.yu/English/Shipbuilding/Tema4.htm

But I've never heard of any serious interest in MHD generators, at least for sewater. There's some interest in MHD generators using plasma as the conducting medium. Google finds for instance the explosive magnetohydrodynamic generator

http://www.stormingmedia.us/90/9059/A905953.html

The goal is apparently to provide a power supply for high power pulsed microwave devices, which could be used to burn out electronics
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, while I agree that you can't really replace coils with water, liquids are used in sophisticated technology that requires really good conductivity. Liquid Hydrogen is used in MRI machines, as a way of conductivity. It's just that it would be more expensive, and probably more fragile, to use water as a conducter instead of a coil. I'm not sure, but I believe some metals have better conductivity, than water anyways.
 
Zeteg said:
Well, while I agree that you can't really replace coils with water, liquids are used in sophisticated technology that requires really good conductivity. Liquid Hydrogen is used in MRI machines, as a way of conductivity. It's just that it would be more expensive, and probably more fragile, to use water as a conducter instead of a coil. I'm not sure, but I believe some metals have better conductivity, than water anyways.

That makes sense because liquid hydrogen is at almost obsolute zero, which means any current that goes through it will have very very little resistance, making it very conductive. Now that i think about it, it would be awsome to have a coil of wire in a generator which would be surrounded by a tube filled with liquid hydrogen/nitrogen/helium, using liquid nitrogen would be the least expensive. In fact I believe that people are planning to make the power lines that take electricity to homes have that kind of tube around it filled with some cold substance. If power lines are made that way, they would be able to power (im guessing) thousands more homes. Since I=V/R, at almost absolute zero R is very small, which gives a huge current. If absolute zero is ever achived in the wires, then the resistance would be 0, therefore I=V/0 = infinity, you would have infinite current.
 
  • #10
Zeteg said:
I'm not sure, but I believe some metals have better conductivity, than water anyways.

Water in its pure state doesn't conduct electricity at all. There has to be ions in the water to carry the current.
 
  • #11
GOD__AM said:
Water in its pure state doesn't conduct electricity at all. There has to be ions in the water to carry the current.

Like, for instance, sea water, which has salt.
 
  • #12
Yes, and with water you have many problems because there's only so much you can disolve in it in order for it to have ions. While with metals, you don't have the problem since its already conductive and plus is can be made superconductive if cooled.
 
  • #13
You can generate electricity using the difference in temperature at the surface of the sea and deep down.It has been tested near Hawaii somewhere.Don't ask me where.
 
  • #14
ArmoSkater87 said:
Yes, and with water you have many problems because there's only so much you can disolve in it in order for it to have ions. While with metals, you don't have the problem since its already conductive and plus is can be made superconductive if cooled.

The main attraction of MHD propulsion systems that attracts research interest is that they are potentially very quiet. See for instance "Red October". But they aren't the greatest as far as effeciency goes. Providing the intense magnetic field they need is a problem as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
14K