Why didn't they use the name Susan?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rewebster
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a lawsuit involving Lindsay Lohan and E-Trade, specifically questioning the use of the name "Susan" in an advertisement. Participants explore the implications of celebrity recognition and the perceived self-centeredness of Lohan's actions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Lohan's lawsuit is an attempt to maintain her visibility in the media, with one stating that "bad publicity is better than no publicity."
  • Others argue that Lohan's perception of her name's value may not align with reality, with a participant claiming she will find that E-Trade was justified in their choice.
  • A later reply humorously proposes that Susan Sarandon could also sue for the use of her name, indicating a view that the lawsuit is frivolous.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity and seriousness of Lohan's lawsuit, with no consensus on whether it is justified or frivolous.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying opinions on celebrity culture and the implications of name recognition in advertising, with no clear resolution on the merits of the lawsuit.

rewebster
Messages
883
Reaction score
2
"Why didn't they use the name Susan?"

"Lindsay Lohan wants $100M over E-Trade ad"

"Lohan's lawyer, Stephanie Ovadia, said the actress has the same single-name recognition as Oprah or Madonna"

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/lohan_such_baby_jVdQWABj9z0MgXzCv1Nh1O


Here's one that will go in the "How self-centered are some people?" column.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


beach-1.jpg
 
Last edited:


rewebster said:
Here's one that will go in the "How self-centered are some people?" column.

Don't EVEN get upset about it. She's just trying to keep her name in the news. "Bad publicity is better than no publicity."
 


She'll win the case, but she still won't be happy with the outcome: she'll find that Etrade was right and her name isn't worth as much as she thinks it is!
 


She'll win the case
How? This lawsuit seems as frivolous as it could possibly be. Susan Sarandon should sue them for suggesting her name. She could say "Why did you suggest Susan as an alternative and not Leroy?" Then I'll have to get involved and complete madness will ensue.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K