Can Wi-Fi reach a swimmer in a fresh water pool?

  • Thread starter Thread starter markg2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Penetration Water
AI Thread Summary
Wi-Fi signals struggle to penetrate fresh water, with estimates suggesting a usable range of only about 1 inch due to the wavelength of 2.4 GHz signals. The presence of dissolved salts and cleaning agents like chlorine in pool water further reduces signal penetration. While some sources claim up to 1 meter might be achievable, this is likely overly optimistic. The consensus indicates that expectations should be tempered, and practical testing is recommended to determine actual performance. Overall, reliable Wi-Fi access for swimmers in a pool is unlikely.
markg2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Approximately how far will a signal penetrate a fresh water pool from the surface to a swimmer assuming current Wi-Fi standards?

With at least 6-8" of water penetration I would purchase an iPod Touch and listen to streaming radio while doing laps.

Thanks,

Mark
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Got this from http://www.network-builders.com/wifi-range-under-water-t38480p2.html
Not sure how accurate. In fact, one inch seems a little low. But i don't know.
Another site forum suggested that 1 meter is max.

"Radio waves generally penetrate water to around 1/4 wavelength.
considering the wavelength of 2.4 Ghz WiFi is about 0.13m (13Cm) you
can expect a useable range of around 3 Cm (a little over 1 Inch )"
 
The problem lies in the salinity of the water and the amount of free ions. Pure, distilled water will not absorb radio waves to a large degree. However, the dissolved salts and other ions in water greatly adds to its conductivity and suppresses the transmissions of radio waves. I would say that with pool water, I would not expect much penetration due to the addition of cleaning agents such as chlorine. But without having any numbers or experiments with this situation most of us are probably only going to be able to give you an educated guess. Best bet would be to just try it out and see but keep expectations reserved.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top