Can Wi-Fi reach a swimmer in a fresh water pool?

  • Thread starter Thread starter markg2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Penetration Water
AI Thread Summary
Wi-Fi signals struggle to penetrate fresh water, with estimates suggesting a usable range of only about 1 inch due to the wavelength of 2.4 GHz signals. The presence of dissolved salts and cleaning agents like chlorine in pool water further reduces signal penetration. While some sources claim up to 1 meter might be achievable, this is likely overly optimistic. The consensus indicates that expectations should be tempered, and practical testing is recommended to determine actual performance. Overall, reliable Wi-Fi access for swimmers in a pool is unlikely.
markg2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Approximately how far will a signal penetrate a fresh water pool from the surface to a swimmer assuming current Wi-Fi standards?

With at least 6-8" of water penetration I would purchase an iPod Touch and listen to streaming radio while doing laps.

Thanks,

Mark
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Got this from http://www.network-builders.com/wifi-range-under-water-t38480p2.html
Not sure how accurate. In fact, one inch seems a little low. But i don't know.
Another site forum suggested that 1 meter is max.

"Radio waves generally penetrate water to around 1/4 wavelength.
considering the wavelength of 2.4 Ghz WiFi is about 0.13m (13Cm) you
can expect a useable range of around 3 Cm (a little over 1 Inch )"
 
The problem lies in the salinity of the water and the amount of free ions. Pure, distilled water will not absorb radio waves to a large degree. However, the dissolved salts and other ions in water greatly adds to its conductivity and suppresses the transmissions of radio waves. I would say that with pool water, I would not expect much penetration due to the addition of cleaning agents such as chlorine. But without having any numbers or experiments with this situation most of us are probably only going to be able to give you an educated guess. Best bet would be to just try it out and see but keep expectations reserved.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top