How Tall Should Stiffeners Be to Meet Allowable Stress on a Baseplate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr_dude32
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the height of stiffeners required to meet allowable stress on a baseplate subjected to a moment. Participants explore calculations related to moment capacity, stress, and the centroid of the stiffened plate, focusing on theoretical and mathematical aspects of structural engineering.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Post 1 outlines the problem of calculating the moment capacity of an un-stiffened plate and the need for stiffeners to satisfy allowable stress requirements.
  • Some participants propose using the moment of inertia formula Iz=(b)(h^3)/12 to find the moment capacity of the un-stiffened plate.
  • Others discuss the calculation of the centroid for the stiffened base plate and the use of Y(bar) in their calculations.
  • One participant mentions a need to verify the calculations for the moment (M) and the centroid (Ybar) derived from the areas of the stiffeners.
  • There is a suggestion that solving the problem analytically may be complicated, with alternatives including numerical methods or trial and error.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the correctness of their calculations, particularly regarding the value of x and the moment of inertia (MOI) summation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correctness of the calculations or the best method to solve the problem. Multiple competing views on the approach to the problem remain, with some advocating for analytical solutions and others suggesting numerical methods or trial and error.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved mathematical steps, particularly concerning the calculation of the moment of inertia and the determination of the centroid. The discussion highlights dependencies on specific assumptions and the complexity of the calculations involved.

mr_dude32
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A ¾” by 21” wide base plate is required to resist an applied moment of 250 in-kips,
(bent about the weak axis). The allowable stress for the plate is 0.75*fy and fy = 36 ksi.
The plate may not work and may require stiffeners. Three stiffeners can be welded onto
the plate and used to increase the moment capacity. The stiffened plate has an allowable
bending stress of 0.66*fy and of course fy still = 36 ksi. Determine the moment capacity
of the un-stiffened plate, find the stress on the un-stiffened plate due to the moment.
Lastly, (and most importantly), find out how tall the stiffeners need to be to satisfy the
allowable stress requirements.

- I know i have to find the moment around the weak axis using Iz=(b)(h^3)/12 where b=21 and h=3/4, and i also know for the siffeners I=sum{(bh^3)/12 + Ad^2}
 

Attachments

  • baseplate.png
    baseplate.png
    6.2 KB · Views: 775
Physics news on Phys.org
mr_dude32: OK. So list the other relevant equations. And show your work. We do not tell you how to solve your homework here. We just check math.
 
okay so here is what i have so far:

the moment cap. of the un-stiffened plate i used Iz=(bh^3)/12= (21)(.75^3)/12= .73828
then knowing [tex]\sigma[/tex]allow=Mc/Iz i solved for M where c=(3/4)/2 resulting in M equaling roughly 53.15 kip*in.

my next step is finding the centroid of the stiffened base plate using the variable X for the height of ea. extension so far resulting in Y(bar)= (1.125x^2+1.6875x+5.90625)/(2.25x+15.75)

then to find the MOI using Sum{ (bh^3)/12 + Ad^2 } where d is going to be the |Y(bar)-centroid for each rectagle|
Note: stiffened base plate is broken into 4 parts 3 of which are .75*x and the 4th is 21*.75

Is this the right track for solving?
 
Last edited:
mr_dude32: Your answer for M is currently incorrect. Try again. If you still get your current answer, include how you computed M. (You can hit the Edit button to correct your post, if you wish.)
 
thanks for catching that, i came out with 53.156 kip-in when i did it again!
 
Excellent. I have not yet been able to obtain your ybar function. I need to know where your datum is located for your ybar derivation.
 
To solve for my Ybar i broke the region into 4 parts:

Part_______ Area______Ybar_______Ybar*Area
1:________.75*x_____.75+x/2____.5625x+.375x^2
2:________.75*x_____.75+x/2____.5625x+.375x^2
3:________.75*x_____.75+x/2____.5625x+.375x^2
4:________.75*21______.375________5.90625

Area Total: 2.25x+15.75 (Ybar*Area Total): 1.125x^2+ 1.6875x+ 5.90625

Where (Ybar)[tex]\sum[/tex](Area)= [tex]\sum[/tex](Ybar*Area Total)
therefor Ybar=([tex]\sum[/tex](Ybar*Area Total))/[tex]\sum[/tex]Area)

Ybar=(1.125x^2+1.6875x+5.90625)/(2.25x+15.75 )
or in another form Ybar=.5x-2.75+49.21875/(2.25x+15.75)
 
Last edited:
Excellent work, mr_dude32. Your ybar is correct. I.e., the second to last line of post 7, and ybar in post 3, are correct. (The last line of post 7 looks incorrect; but we can ignore it.)

Your procedure in post 3 is correct. Do you plan on solving this problem analytically (closed-form); i.e., using algebra and hand calculations? Or do you plan on solving it numerically, using a computer?
 
I just tried solving it by hand and got an X value of -5.65 inches so i know its wrong. do you know of any "safer" means of solving it. Thank you so much for helping check my work.

The next step i took was to sum the for the MOI for all 4 parts:

Iz=[tex]\sum[/tex](bh^3)/12 + Ad^2 , which resulted in a 3rd degree polynomial but i must have made a mistake somewhere when solving by hand. any recomendations for how you would sum all the MOI?
 
  • #10
I could be wrong, but my current impression is that it might be too complicated to solve analytically. If so, other solution methods would be (a) numerically, using a computer, or (b) trial and error, by hand.
 
  • #11
mr_dude32 said:
I just tried solving it by hand, and got an x value of -5.65 inches, so I know it's wrong. ... The next step I took was to sum the MOI.
mr_dude32: As you know, you cannot compute the MOI until you obtain a valid value for x. I do not yet understand how you solved for x by hand, because it involves a fourth-degree polynomial. How do you plan to solve for x? Try again.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Trial and error is good for a student because it makes you repeat and learn a procedure. It also gives you an opportunity to detect and correct errors.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K