Oersted: how can you be sure it is not an electric field?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Oersted's experiment, which demonstrates the relationship between electric current and magnetic fields. Participants explore how to differentiate between the effects of electric fields and magnetic fields on a compass needle in the context of this experiment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • A teacher demonstrates Oersted's experiment, showing that a compass needle moves when current flows through a wire, suggesting a magnetic field is produced by the current.
  • Some participants propose using aluminum foil to block electric fields, arguing that if the compass needle still moves, it indicates a magnetic field is at play.
  • One participant explains that electric fields are perpendicular to the current's motion, while magnetic fields are not, suggesting that only magnetic fields can cause the compass deflection.
  • Another participant suggests measuring the electric field to show it is zero or demonstrating that the compass responds only to magnetic fields, but raises concerns about the presence of electric fields from static charges on the wire.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of testing every possible configuration of electric fields to definitively show the cause of the compass deflection.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to demonstrate that the compass needle's movement is due to a magnetic field rather than an electric field. There is no consensus on a definitive method to resolve the student's question.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the situation, including the presence of static electric fields around the wire and the challenges of testing various configurations to isolate the effects of electric and magnetic fields.

damosuz
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
A teacher demonstrates Oerted's experiment in class. He places a compass on top of a straight wire and then shows that when a current flows in the wire, the compass needle moves. Since a compass always moves under the effect of a magnetic field, he says the experiment shows that an electric current produces a magnetic field.

A student asks him how can we be sure it is not an electric field that affects the compass needle. What should the teacher answer?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Place a piece of aluminum foil (or aluminum sheet) between compass and wire (carrying a DC current), or wrap the wire with several layers of aluminum foil.

Bob S
 
damosuz said:
A teacher demonstrates Oerted's experiment in class. He places a compass on top of a straight wire and then shows that when a current flows in the wire, the compass needle moves. Since a compass always moves under the effect of a magnetic field, he says the experiment shows that an electric current produces a magnetic field.

A student asks him how can we be sure it is not an electric field that affects the compass needle. What should the teacher answer?

Thank you.

Electric field will be in the plane perpendicular to the motion of current, and Magnetic field will be perpendicular to the electric field. Right hand rule. Direction of current =E X H, where X denotes Cross product.
Because compass kept over top of wire.
So electric field cannot make deflection ! . Only Magnetic can.
 
Let's assume that the only thing the student knows about at this stage of the course is how static charges produce electric fields and how electric fields affect matter. The teacher has to show him it cannot be an electric field that makes the needle move.

Bob S, could you tell me more about using the aluminum foil? What would that show?
 
You guys are making it way too hard.

(1) You measure the electric field (e.g. via the force on a test charge) and show that it is zero.

or, (2) You show that the compass responds to magnetic fields and not electric fields.
 
damosuz said:
Bob S, could you tell me more about using the aluminum foil? What would that show?
Aluminum (or copper) is a non-magnetic electrical conductor, and will block electrical fields, and not DC magnetic fields. In addition, the aluminum foil can be grounded to block any electrostatic electric fields.

If placing the aluminum foil between the wire and the compass has no effect on the deflection of the compass needle, the deflection must be due to something other than electric field from the wire. e.g., magnetic field.

Bob S
 
Vanadium 50 said:
You guys are making it way too hard.

(1) You measure the electric field (e.g. via the force on a test charge) and show that it is zero.

or, (2) You show that the compass responds to magnetic fields and not electric fields.

Thanks for your input. However I still see some problems:

(1) If you do that, you will find that there is actually an electric field in the surroundings of the wire (the field due to the static charge on the surface of the wire responsible for the electric field inside the wire that is itself responsible for the DC current). Thus the student could say this electric field is the one that makes the needle of the compass move. He would be wrong, but the teacher will not be able to show him why...

(2) But the teacher would have to put the compass in every possible configuration of electric field, which is impossible! The student could always say the wire may produce a configuration you haven't tried...
 

Similar threads

Replies
152
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K