PDA

View Full Version : Air Intakes??


sorter
Oct31-10, 05:39 AM
At an early stage of the fighter's development
it became obvious that the MFI was a
lot different from the American fifth-generation
fighters. For instance, the Mikoyan fighter
had a variable ventral air intake from the
start, whereas the F-22 had non-adjustable
two-shock lateral intakes optimised for supersonic
cruise and the rival Northrop/General
Dynamics YF-23 had non-adjustable dorsal
intakes. Soviet aerodynamicists believed a
ventrally located intake offered certain
advantages during vigorous manoeuvres,
minimising the danger of an intake stall during
high-G turns and high-alpha flight. Also,
the tail-first layout maximised lift and the
canards performed a pitch damping function
at critical AoAs. By comparison, the F-22 and
YF-23 utilised a more conventional layout
with trapezoidal wings and stabilators.

Source:
Russian Fifth-Generation Fighter
Technology Demonstrators
Yefim Gordon
Original translation by Dmitriy Komissarov

Question is simple; is Soviet thinking while choosing from 3 given air intakes is correct & why US think otherwise??

russ_watters
Nov1-10, 12:26 AM
It just sounds like the two sets of designers had different priorities in mind when designing the intakes. Each is correct for the priority it optimizes to.

sorter
Nov5-10, 10:08 AM
Can anybody given me images of these 3 types of air intakes; I am fed up googling it

NobodySpecial
Nov5-10, 10:45 AM
Russian Fifth-Generation Fighter
Technology Demonstrators
Yefim Gordon

This could mean war - '5th generation fighter' is a registered trademark of Lockheed (makers of the F35).
This just came up in a lawsuit in Canada over their decision to buy the F35, apparently the air force specification required a '5th generation fighter'.
The specifications were written with the aid of consultants supplied by an unnamed US aircraft maker.

mugaliens
Nov6-10, 12:43 AM
In addition to the excessive angles of attack envisioned by Soviet aeronautical engineers, they also had to contend with operations from austere (grass) fields which required upper inlets.

sorter
Nov6-10, 10:27 AM
In addition to the excessive angles of attack envisioned by Soviet aeronautical engineers, they also had to contend with operations from austere (grass) fields which required upper inlets.

What does this bold part means. The placement of air intakes with respect to cockpit is fairly equal that of Su-25/30/35 & F-15/35/22

With the exception of F-16/J-10(a copycat of F-16) all modern aircraft had 2 side air intakes. including the newbaby JF-17

NobodySpecial
Nov6-10, 11:02 AM
Most russian aircraft have moveable covers over the inlets which can be partly closed to stop FOD when operating from rough strips.