LogicalAcid
- 137
- 0
By its temperature? I just want to know if I understand Wien's law right.
The discussion revolves around the interpretation of Wien's law in relation to the highest frequency of radiation emitted by an object based on its temperature. Participants explore the implications of temperature on radiation frequency, intensity, and the behavior of black bodies in isolation.
Participants generally agree on the interpretation of Wien's law regarding peak frequency, but there is contention regarding the terminology of "power" versus "intensity." Additionally, the discussion about the highest frequency emitted by a black body introduces competing views that remain unresolved.
Some assumptions about the definitions of intensity and power, as well as the implications of temperature on radiation, are not fully explored. The scenario involving a black body raises questions about the conditions under which the highest frequency can be emitted.
zhermes said:No, Wien's law tells you the peak frequency---i.e. the frequency at which the most power is radiated, based on temperature.
Yes, that would probably be a more clear way of phrasing it. However, the intensity is the power per unit solid-angle, frequency and area.fluidistic said:I concur that the answer is no. However should your word "power" be changed by "intensity"?
zhermes said:Yes, that would probably be a more clear way of phrasing it. However, the intensity is the power per unit solid-angle, frequency and area.
zhermes said:Correct... note that the human body only has the range of a few degrees in which it can operate. Thus the range in peak-intensity of radiation would be minute.