y35dp
Dec15-10, 09:52 AM
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Use the operator expansion theorem to show that
Exp(A+B) = Exp(A)\astExp(B)\astExp(-1/2[A,B]) (1)
when [A,B] = \lambda and \lambda is complex. Relationship (1) is a special case of the Baker-Hausdorff theorem.
2. Relevant equations
Operator expansion theorem
Exp(A)\astB\astExp(-A) = B + [A,B] (2)
3. The attempt at a solution
Take Exp(A+B) and write in terms of a complex number parameter
Exp(xA)\astExp(xB) = C(x)
differentiate wrt parameter x
C'(x) = A\astExp(xA)\astExp(xB) + Exp(xA)\astB\astExp(xB)
Now here is where I'm stuck I think the above needs to be in a similar form to (2) but I can't seem to get it to work. Are there any operator rules that can help?
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
2. Relevant equations
3. The attempt at a solution
Use the operator expansion theorem to show that
Exp(A+B) = Exp(A)\astExp(B)\astExp(-1/2[A,B]) (1)
when [A,B] = \lambda and \lambda is complex. Relationship (1) is a special case of the Baker-Hausdorff theorem.
2. Relevant equations
Operator expansion theorem
Exp(A)\astB\astExp(-A) = B + [A,B] (2)
3. The attempt at a solution
Take Exp(A+B) and write in terms of a complex number parameter
Exp(xA)\astExp(xB) = C(x)
differentiate wrt parameter x
C'(x) = A\astExp(xA)\astExp(xB) + Exp(xA)\astB\astExp(xB)
Now here is where I'm stuck I think the above needs to be in a similar form to (2) but I can't seem to get it to work. Are there any operator rules that can help?
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
2. Relevant equations
3. The attempt at a solution