PDA

View Full Version : Sum of a Series


AdkinsJr
Dec22-10, 04:08 PM
I'm trying to review some calc, I went through the series and sequence sections pretty rapidly since my courses were all quarter-length.

I want to find x such that the series converges and find the sum.


1+x^2+2x^3+x^4+2x^5+x^6...

=(1+x^2)+(2x^3+x^4)+(2x^5+x^6)...(2x^{2n+1}+x^{2n} )

\Sigma_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(x^{2n}+2x^{2n+1}\right) =\Sigma_{n=0}^{\infty}\left{(x^2)^n\right+\Sigma_{ n=0}^{\infty}2x(x^2)^n

So I think that the series converges for

0< \mid x^2\mid < 1 \rightarrow 0<x<1

and the sum is

\frac{1}{1-x^2}+\frac{2x}{1-x^2}=\frac{1+2x}{1-x^2}

Is this correct? I don't have solution for this one... I'm not comfortable with it.

mathman
Dec22-10, 04:21 PM
It looks almost right. In your original series there is no 2x term, but later you include it. Also the convergence is for -1 < x < 1.

arildno
Dec22-10, 04:37 PM
Hmm..I'd rather rewrite this as:
2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}x^{n}-\sum_{n}^{\infty}(x^{2})^{n}=\frac{2}{1-x}-\frac{1}{1-x^{2}}=\frac{2+2x}{1-x^{2}}-\frac{1}{1-x^{2}}=\frac{1+2x}{1-x^{2}}

AdkinsJr
Dec22-10, 05:31 PM
It looks almost right. In your original series there is no 2x term, but later you include it.

The term was in the original series, I htink you mean the 2x factor was on the term. That factor came from the following algebra:

2x^{2n+1}=2xx^{2n}=2x(x^2)^n

Edit: Latex isn't working right, I typed 2xx^{2n} on the second step above...

Also the convergence is for -1 < x < 1.

That makes sense...

ojs
Dec22-10, 08:01 PM
If you look at your original series there is no term there that has 2x (just 2x nothing else) in it. But if you look at your sum and put n = 0, the outcome would be 1 + 2x ... so there is a slight flaw, but easely fixed by subtracting 2x from the sigma notation.

mathman
Dec23-10, 04:11 PM
The term was in the original series, I htink you mean the 2x factor was on the term. That factor came from the following algebra:

2x^{2n+1}=2xx^{2n}=2x(x^2)^n

Edit: Latex isn't working right, I typed 2xx^{2n} on the second step above...



That makes sense...

The 2x I was referring to was simply the missing term (as ojs pointed out).

AdkinsJr
Dec23-10, 05:37 PM
The 2x I was referring to was simply the missing term (as ojs pointed out).

Oh yes, haha. I see now. I just typed the original series wrong. It is 1+2x+x^2+2x^3...The grouping should be (1+2x)+(x^2+2x^3)...

tiny-tim
Dec23-10, 05:44 PM
= (1 + x2 + x3 + …) + (x3 + x5 + …) :wink: