Katie1990
Dec26-10, 06:34 PM
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
I am tasked to summarise this paper http://chaos.swarthmore.edu/courses/PDG07/AJP/AJP000125.pdf
I am struggeling to understand the statements of tension at the bottom of the first side namely
For an element at geostationary height that is, at a distance from the Earth’s center equal to the radius of geostationary orbit the weight and centrifugal forces are equal W=FC, and therefore the tension forces at the two ends must also be equal FU=FD for equilibrium. For an element below geostationary height, the weight force W exceeds the centrifugal force FC and one must have FUFD for equilibrium. These two preceding statements imply that the tension in the tower increases with height from ground level to geostationary height. In contrast, for an element above the geostationary height, the centrifugal force FC exceeds the weight W and hence FUFD for equilibrium, implying that the tension in the tower decreases as a function of height past the geostationary height. A free standing tower is one for which
the tension drops to zero at both ends, requiring no restraint at either end to keep the tower in place. The overall picture of a free standing tower is thus of a structure in which the tension rises from zero at ground level to a maximum value at geostationary height, and then decreases to zero again at the upper end.
2. Relevant equations
3. The attempt at a solution
I cant understand why tension is maximum at geostationary orbit surely the two tensions at this point sum to zero? And shouldn't the tensions at each end be maximum and not zero as stated?
I am tasked to summarise this paper http://chaos.swarthmore.edu/courses/PDG07/AJP/AJP000125.pdf
I am struggeling to understand the statements of tension at the bottom of the first side namely
For an element at geostationary height that is, at a distance from the Earth’s center equal to the radius of geostationary orbit the weight and centrifugal forces are equal W=FC, and therefore the tension forces at the two ends must also be equal FU=FD for equilibrium. For an element below geostationary height, the weight force W exceeds the centrifugal force FC and one must have FUFD for equilibrium. These two preceding statements imply that the tension in the tower increases with height from ground level to geostationary height. In contrast, for an element above the geostationary height, the centrifugal force FC exceeds the weight W and hence FUFD for equilibrium, implying that the tension in the tower decreases as a function of height past the geostationary height. A free standing tower is one for which
the tension drops to zero at both ends, requiring no restraint at either end to keep the tower in place. The overall picture of a free standing tower is thus of a structure in which the tension rises from zero at ground level to a maximum value at geostationary height, and then decreases to zero again at the upper end.
2. Relevant equations
3. The attempt at a solution
I cant understand why tension is maximum at geostationary orbit surely the two tensions at this point sum to zero? And shouldn't the tensions at each end be maximum and not zero as stated?