EMP Danger: 1m Distance, Concrete Walls & Directional Effects

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wimms
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Levels
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the dangers posed by electromagnetic pulses (EMP) to electronic equipment, particularly at a distance of 1 meter from the source. Participants explore how concrete walls, especially those reinforced with metal, may influence the effects of EMP, and whether EMP can exhibit directional characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the energy levels of EMP that could damage electronics at a distance of 1 meter and how concrete walls might alter this effect.
  • Another participant explains that EMP refers to electromagnetic pulses, primarily in the radio and microwave range, and asserts that electromagnetic energy can indeed be directional.
  • A different participant references historical H-bomb tests, noting that they produced EMP effects on electronics hundreds of miles away, suggesting a significant scale of energy involved.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the nature of EMP, comparing it to a monopulse and discussing the induction of electricity in wires due to magnetic field changes.
  • Another participant discusses the effectiveness of Faraday cages, stating that the size of holes in conducting materials must be smaller than the wavelength of the electromagnetic radiation to block it, and mentions the role of rebar in concrete structures.
  • There is a question about the protection of audio-video equipment with metal bodies against EMP, and speculation about the behavior of EMP energy in relation to iron reinforcement in concrete walls.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of concrete and metal reinforcement against EMP, with no consensus reached on the specifics of how EMP interacts with these materials or the energy levels required to damage electronics.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various assumptions regarding the nature of EMP, including its directional properties and the specific energy thresholds for different types of electronic devices. The discussion also reflects uncertainty about the precise mechanisms of EMP interaction with materials.

wimms
Messages
489
Reaction score
0
What is considered dangerous energy of EMP to blow away electronics equipment at 1m distance?
How does concrete wall change that? And if concrete wall has metal rods in it?
Can EMP be directional?

ps. Any pointers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EMP stands for "electromagnetic pulse." "Electromagnetic" is a broad term which covers the entire range of the electromagnetic spectrum. Usually the term is used when referring to the radio and microwave range. That includes radios, cell phones, microwave ovens, and radar. Clearly electromagnetic energy can be directional - all you need is a dish.

As for how much it takes to fry components, it depends entirely on the device you are trying to fry. It could be kilowatts or megawatts. Concrete won't do anything to stop it. Steel will.
 
I'm not sure how much amplitude it would take, but I do know that the H-bomb test in which we discovered the effects of EMP put out electronics hundreds of miles away, if that gives any sense of proportion.

This site gives some good info, but not any data on the amount of energy required (unless you count the explosive energy needed to power the e-bomb).
 
hmm, for some reason I thought EMP is more like flashlight, single superfast discharge of energy through electric magnet, sort of monopulse. I have understood, that sharp step of magnetic field induces electricity in wires that kills stuff.
As Russ put it, basically even morse code is EMP in action, let alone pulsed laser in CD-writers.
I'm not sure, but isn't there some kind of distinction between EMP of harmonic oscillators and EMP of single half-period pulse, like discharging single highvolt capacitor into electromagnet?

By devices I meant home appliances like radios, TVsets, audio equipment.

H-bombs aren't of interest, because I'm interested about safety limits of playing with EMP at home.

Russ, concrete won't stop it, but concrete walls have metal rods in them, sort of faraday cage or someth. How would you try to account for it?
 
In general a rule of thumb is that for a Faraday cage to work, the "holes" in the conducting material must be smaller than the wavelength of the E-M radiation in order to block them. Radio waves are from meters to kilometers long, so rebar in concrete structures would absorb some of that energy.

More energetic photons, like microwaves, can be shielded only if the holes are on the order of millimeters in size. (This is why you can see into your microwave oven without boiling the blood in your face: those waves are about 1 to 2 cm in wavelength)

But I know that in submarines, electronic instruments are protected from EMPs by a metallic mesh that is finer that a centimeter (that's as specific as my source will get: my Dad still thinks the cold war is on). THis leads me to believe that the E-M waves that fry electronic equipment are of the microwave to infrared variety.

Iron reinforced concrete would be essentially transparent to such E-M waves.

Of course I could have research this before speaking up, but if I'm wrong, I'm sure someone will tell me.
 
ok, how well is protected audio-video equipment that has metal body?
Russ estimated kilowatts to megawatts would damage it.
Also, suppose iron reinforcement in concrete wall is a barrier for EMP. Where does EMP energy go then? Reflect off the walls? But if its generated within the walls, will it bounce back-n-forth until it just dies out?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
8K