View Full Version : Not understanding definition
Miike012
Jan11-11, 05:25 PM
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Molecular Substance... Is a substance that has molecules, all of which are the same....
im guessing it means... C sub4 is a molecular substance but if it was just Carbon itself ... it would not be a molecular substance because it is just an element and not a molecule... is this correct?
2. Relevant equations
3. The attempt at a solution
HallsofIvy
Jan11-11, 06:34 PM
No, a molecule can consist of a single atom. And 4 Carbon atoms linked as a single group would certainly be a "molecule".
Miike012
Jan11-11, 07:00 PM
I understand that if 4 carbons are linked together is a molecule However if it is just One carbon atom therefore because it is just a single atom and not a group of atoms chemically bonded that means it is not a molecule... is this correct?
Webster: (molecule is) the smallest physical unit of an element or compound, consisting of one or more like atoms in an element and two or more different atoms in a compound.
Wow, my world has been shattered a little... (not really) My understanding had always been like the first sentence on Wikipedia's article on Molecule (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecule): A molecule is defined as a group of at least two atoms in a definite arrangement held together by covalent chemical bonds.
So by Webster's definition, could Na(s) and He(g) also be considered molecules?
Read fine print in wikipedia.
I am not sure how to treat solid Na - it is a metal, so there is a metallic bond involved. He(g) is a molecule.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.