Do A and Uinv(A)U Share Eigenvalues?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between an operator A and the transformed operator Uinv(A)U, specifically whether they share the same eigenvalues. The context involves linear algebra and operator theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks to understand the conditions under which A and Uinv(A)U have the same eigenvalues and questions the necessity of U being unitary. Participants suggest manipulating the eigenvalue equation Av = λv to explore the transformation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering suggestions for manipulation of equations and clarifying misunderstandings. There is a recognition of the need for careful handling of operator order in matrix multiplication, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the manipulation of equations and the implications of operator order, highlighting the complexities involved in the discussion.

Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
A is an operator and Uinv is the inverse of operator U

How am I to show that A and Uinv(A)U have the same eigenvalues? Must U be unitary for this to be true?

And if the eigenvectors of A are (Psi n), what are the eigenvectors of Uinv(A)U?

Help anyone? Not sure what to do here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unitarity of U is not required. To prove your assertion, try to start with the equation [tex]Av=\lambda v[/tex]. How may you manipulate this equation to obtain [tex]U^{-1}AU[/tex]?
 
So can I just do something like following:?

We know [tex]Av=\lambda 2 v[/tex]

We then let [tex]Uv=\lambda 1 v[/tex]

So then [tex]Av \lambda1=\lambda 2 \lambda1 v[/tex]

Then since we know
[tex]U^{-1}U=1[/tex], we know

[tex]U^{-1}v=v/(\lambda 1 )[/tex]

Thus[tex]U^{-1}AUv=\lambda 2 v[/tex]
 
Not quite, but close. Multiply the original equation on the left by [tex]U[/tex] then insert [tex]1 = U^{-1}U[/tex] and work from there...
 
Can you explain to me why what I did is wrong? And when you say to multiply thee original equation by U, and then use the fact that 1=U multiplied by its inverse, it seems that the order of terms in the equation is altered from the expected result [tex]U^{-1}AU[/tex]

And I know when it comes to matrix multiplication AB does not equal BA, so I am a tad confused as to what you want me to do. I apologize for my slowness.
 
To get you started,

[tex]Av=\lambda v[/tex]
[tex]U^{-1}Av=\lambda U^{-1}v[/tex]

Now how may you manipulate the last equation to get [tex]U^{-1}AU[/tex]?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K