Tagent vector and vector field difference

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the differences between tangent vectors and vector fields within the context of differential geometry. Participants explore definitions, relationships, and examples related to these concepts, aiming to clarify their understanding.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants define the tangent space at a point on a manifold as spanned by basis vectors, while others emphasize that tangent vectors are linear functions from smooth functions defined on the manifold to real numbers.
  • A vector field is described as a function that assigns a tangent vector to each point in a subset of the manifold, with some noting that this definition varies slightly between physics and mathematics literature.
  • One participant suggests that a tangent vector can be viewed as a derivative, while a vector field represents a differential equation.
  • Another participant provides an example involving a tangent vector operating on a smooth function, attempting to illustrate the relationship between tangent vectors and vector fields.
  • Some participants clarify that a tangent vector is specific to a point in the tangent space, while a vector field encompasses a collection of tangent vectors across a region of the manifold.
  • There is a discussion about notation and the importance of maintaining consistency when expressing relationships between tangent vectors and functions.
  • One participant acknowledges a mistake in notation but expresses a growing understanding of the concepts discussed.
  • A later reply reiterates that a vector field can be seen as a family of tangent vectors, with a special case being a tangent vector defined on a single point set.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding and agreement on the definitions and relationships between tangent vectors and vector fields. Some definitions and interpretations remain contested, and no consensus is reached on all aspects of the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for confusion arising from different definitions in physics versus mathematics, as well as the importance of precise notation in expressing relationships between concepts.

weio
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi there

Can somebody please explain shortly the difference between a tangent vector and a vector field? I'm still new to differential geometry. I read couple of sources
that had mixed claims on which of them actually act on a given function f. so I'm kind of confused.

Much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The tangent space T_pM of the manifold M at point p can be defined as the vector space spanned by the basis vectors

\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}\bigg\lvert_p

where x is a coordinate system (a chart). (There is also a coordinate independent definition, but it will result in the same quantities being called tangent vectors, so it's equvalent to this one).

Let F denote the set of smooth (C^\infty) functions from M into R (the set of real numbers). The vectors in the tangent spaces are linear functions from F into R

In the physics literature, a vector field is sometimes defined as a function that takes each point p in a subset U of M to a vector in the tangent space at p. In the mathematics literature the definition is a little more complicated, but it's still pretty close to the sloppy physicist's definition.

I'm not 100% sure that I remember the mathematical definition 100% correctly, but I think this is at least very close to it:

The tangent bundle TM of the manifold M is defined by

TM=\big\{(p,v)|p\in M, v\in \bigcup_{q\in M}T_qM\big\}

The function \pi:TM\rightarrow M defined by

\pi(p,v)=p

is called the projection.

A vector field is a section of the tangent bundle. A section is a function X:M\rightarrow TM, such that

\pi(X(p))=p
 
Last edited:
Fredrik is completely correct.

In simpler, less precise, terms, a "vector field" is an assignment of a tangent vector at EVERY POINT.

In a certain sense, while a tangent vector IS a derivative (the gradient of a function), a vector field is a differential equation.
 
Hi Fredrik, HallsofIvy, and all

First of all thanks for the explanation Fredrik and HallsofIvy, but just to make sure i understand this, i will try to give an example.

Let X_p be a tangent vector in an open neighborhood U of a point p \in R^n and let f be a C^\infty function in U. F^i are the smooth functions from M into R , and suppose that X_p = (X,p), where the components of the Euclidean vector X are a^1,...,a^n. Then for any function f, the tangent vector <br /> X_p operates on f according to


X_p(f) = \sum_{i=1}^n a^i ( \frac{ \partial} { \partial F^i } )(p).

which can be written as

X_p(f) = a^i ( \frac{\partial} { \partial F^i } )p.

And this equation is basically the vector field, which assigns the tangent vector to the point.

The quantities

( \frac{ \partial } { \partial F^1})p,..., ( \frac{\partial}{ \partial F^n})p

form the basis for a tangent space T_p(R^n) at the point p.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.

weio
 
"A tangent vector in an open neighborhood..." It sounds like you're talking about a vector field here. A tangent vector is always a member of the tangent space of the manifold at a particular point.

When I use a notation like X_p, this means a vector in the tangent space of M at p. It would be OK to call X a vector field, if X_p\in T_pM and X is the map p\mapsto X_p (physicists' version of a vector field) or the map p\mapsto (p,X_p) (mathematicians' version of a vector field).

It's OK to write

X_p=a^i\frac{\partial}{\partial F^i}\bigg\lvert_p

or

X_p(f)=a^i\frac{\partial}{\partial F^i}\bigg\lvert_p f

but if f appears on the left-hand side you have to keep it on the right-hand side too. Otherwise it looks like a number is equal to a map from the "set of functions from M into R" into R.

The derivative operators (that I prefer to write with the vertical bar and the p as a subscript) are a basis for the tangent space of M at p. T_p\mathbb R^n would be the tangent space of \mathbb R^n at p, but p is a point in M. It is however possible to use the function F to construct a vector space isomorphism from T_pM onto T_{F(p)}\mathbb R^n, but that's kind of off topic.

Note that the maps

p\mapsto\frac{\partial}{\partial F^i}\bigg\lvert_p

are vector fields (physicists' version), but the derivative operators

\frac{\partial}{\partial F^i}\bigg\lvert_p

are tangent vectors. A convinient notation is to denote those maps (the vector fields) by

\frac{\partial}{\partial F^i}

I just dropped the subscript that indicated a position on the manifold, just as I did for X_p. With this notation we have

X=a^i\frac{\partial}{\partial F^i}

This is an equation that describes a relationship between vector fields.
 
Hi

I guess i could have written it as X_p(f) = a^i ( \frac {\partial f} { \partial F^i} )(p), but i missed the f, my bad. Anyways, I understand now, but I think I need more time to get used to the notion of vector fields and tangent vectors. Thanks for the clarification.

weio
 
a vector field is just a family of tangent vectors, one at each point of a given set (usually open) of the manifold. Thus a vector field defined on a one point set, is a just tangent vector!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K