PDA

View Full Version : Basis states, matrix elements and angular momentum


Onamor
Mar3-11, 04:22 PM
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
The last 2 parts of the attached photo. (4 and 6 marks)
Im really not sure how to go about them in a (clever) way that wont take 2 hours.

2. Relevant equations
Possibly the fact that the product of the raising/lowering operators, J-J+ = J2x + J2y

Answers to previous question:
the matrix of J2 = 15/4 \hbar2 I4 (the identity)

and Jz is \hbar/2 times
[3 0 0 0]
[0 1 0 0]
[0 0-1 0]
[0 0 0-3]


3. The attempt at a solution
For the explanation you could say that any operator represented in terms of its basis states is diagonal - but then how can you tell that those four given eigenvectors are the basis states of H? (you're only told that they are eigenvectors of Jz).

The eigenvalues are the enegry eigenvalues (along the diagonal), but to find the matrix (knowing its diagonal) you can just find <1|H|1>, <2|H|2>, <3|H|3> and <4|H|4>. But you need some sort of matrix or equation for the J2x + J2y part of the Hamiltonian - its possible to find their matrices in this basis but I just cant believe there isnt an easier way for 6 marks...

Thanks again to anyone who can help

fzero
Mar3-11, 04:49 PM
For the explanation you could say that any operator represented in terms of its basis states is diagonal - but then how can you tell that those four given eigenvectors are the basis states of H? (you're only told that they are eigenvectors of Jz).


Did you compute [J^2,J_z] for part 2? What does it tell you about the eigenvectors for J^2 and J_z?


The eigenvalues are the enegry eigenvalues (along the diagonal), but to find the matrix (knowing its diagonal) you can just find <1|H|1>, <2|H|2>, <3|H|3> and <4|H|4>. But you need some sort of matrix or equation for the J2x + J2y part of the Hamiltonian - its possible to find their matrices in this basis but I just cant believe there isnt an easier way for 6 marks...


Can you write J_x^2 +J_y^2 in terms of J^2 and J_z?

Onamor
Mar3-11, 05:27 PM
Hi, thanks so much for your help!!

Did you compute [J^2,J_z] for part 2? What does it tell you about the eigenvectors for J^2 and J_z?

Yes, their commutator is zero, so they commute and it is possible to find simultaneous eigenfunctions of both of them.


Can you write J_x^2 +J_y^2 in terms of J^2 and J_z?
I think J^2 - J_z^2 should do it?

Since (given your first tip) an eigenfunction of J_z is simultaneously an eigenfunction of J^2, would rewriting the Hamiltonian using this show that it is expressable in terms of the given four basis states? - and therefore is diagonal?

And then I guess to find the Hamiltonian's (diagonal) matrix elements you can now just use the previously calculated matrices for J^2 and J_z?

That would seems a lot more sensible than what I attempted...

fzero
Mar3-11, 05:39 PM
Since (given your first tip) an eigenfunction of J_z is simultaneously an eigenfunction of J^2, would rewriting the Hamiltonian using this show that it is expressable in terms of the given four basis states? - and therefore is diagonal?

And then I guess to find the Hamiltonian's (diagonal) matrix elements you can now just use the previously calculated matrices for J^2 and J_z?

That would seems a lot more sensible than what I attempted...

Yes, just compute a bit and you'll find that things are as you say. It's hard to get all of this straight just from lectures, so it's exercises like this that really teach you how things work.

Onamor
Mar3-11, 05:56 PM
Thanks again for your help. Yes, all maths needs practise, but QM is nearly unlearnable from books and lectures alone.