LineIntegral
Mar9-11, 02:10 PM
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
The problem is conveniently located here:
http://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/cpt/graduate/lectures/mscps.pdf
Problem no. 31. There's even a solution, here:
http://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/cpt/graduate/lectures/grsolns.pdf
However, I don't understand the solution. How does the antisymmetry of F^{\rho\lambda} allow us to rewrite \nabla_\rho F_{\sigma\lambda} - \frac{1}{2} \nabla_\sigma F_{\rho\lambda} as \frac{1}{2}\left ( \nabla_\rho F_{\sigma\lambda} - \nabla_\lambda F_{\sigma\rho} - \nabla_\sigma F_{\rho\lambda} \right ) ? I just don't see it. This implies that \nabla_\rho F_{\sigma\lambda} = -\nabla_\lambda F_{\sigma\rho}, which doesn't seem right...
2. Relevant equations
See above.
3. The attempt at a solution
See above.
Any help will be much appreciated!
The problem is conveniently located here:
http://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/cpt/graduate/lectures/mscps.pdf
Problem no. 31. There's even a solution, here:
http://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/cpt/graduate/lectures/grsolns.pdf
However, I don't understand the solution. How does the antisymmetry of F^{\rho\lambda} allow us to rewrite \nabla_\rho F_{\sigma\lambda} - \frac{1}{2} \nabla_\sigma F_{\rho\lambda} as \frac{1}{2}\left ( \nabla_\rho F_{\sigma\lambda} - \nabla_\lambda F_{\sigma\rho} - \nabla_\sigma F_{\rho\lambda} \right ) ? I just don't see it. This implies that \nabla_\rho F_{\sigma\lambda} = -\nabla_\lambda F_{\sigma\rho}, which doesn't seem right...
2. Relevant equations
See above.
3. The attempt at a solution
See above.
Any help will be much appreciated!