View Full Version : 3-dimensional potential energy problem
I have a problem on my homework that says the potential energy of a particle is given by its position in the x-y plane according to
P.E. = x^3 + 8x^2 + 34yz
and I have to calculate the force on the particle at point (x,y,z), and all equilibrium points.
dU = 3x^2 dx + 16x dx + 34y dz + 34z dy
and F = -dU/dr with r being the vector position...
-F = 3x^2 dx/dr + 16x dx/dr + 34y dz/dr + 34z dy/dr
but that can't be the answer can it? I'm not given any dx/dr's or anything like that...I have a feeling there's some simple math thing I'm missing.
Any hints anyone can think of?
You need to find the gradient of the potential - it's a vector quantity!
Hmmm...I think my problem might be I've never learned how to take a vector derivative and this might be above my head mathematically :confused:
Maybe I can separate the potential energy into x and y components...but i really don't know how.
I guess since the particle is on the x-y plane, dz = 0...so my equation can be simplified to
F = (-3x^2 - 16x) dx/dr - 34z dy/dr .
Can I change dx/dr and dy/dr into (x-direction) and (y-direction) in terms of the force? Then use pythagorean theorem to find the total force? Am I just rambling?
It's really straightforward:
The x-component of the force is the partial derivative of the potential with respect to x. For the y-component use the partial wrt y and for the z-component use the partial wrt z. Voila!
It's really straightforward:
The x-component of the force is the partial derivative of the potential with respect to x. For the y-component use the partial wrt y and for the z-component use the partial wrt z. Voila!
One caveat: the force is MINUS the gradient of the potential, \vec F = - \vec \nabla V
or, to be more specific,
F_x = - {\partial V(x,y,z) \over \partial x}
F_y = - {\partial V(x,y,z) \over \partial y}
F_z = - {\partial V(x,y,z) \over \partial z}
If the particle is indeed constrained to the xy plane, then the z component of the force will be canceled by a normal force. In the x and y component, one must then set the value of z corresponding to the z plane one is in (z=0 or some other value).
Pat
nrqed,
Thanks - I meant to type "proportional to" but somehow it didn't come out!
If I take the derivative with respect to, say, x, can I assume y and z are constants? If so, I messed up on a pretty simple problem :blushing:
That's essentially what you do when you take partial derivatives which applies here.
Thanks for the help guys!
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.