View Full Version : Rank(A)= Trace(AA*) ??
arthurhenry
Jun21-11, 01:37 PM
I have two questions and I hope it is acceptable...Seemingly unrelated, though I came to wonder about the first while thinking the second. Thanks
1)Is this statement true? or is there a statement that relates Rank(A) and Trace(??)
2) AB-BA=I (When does this identity hold if at all? Field can be closed or Z/Z2, or etc)
micromass
Jun21-11, 01:52 PM
Hi arthurhenry! :smile:
The first one is not true. It is true that Rank(A)=Rank(AA*). But it isn't in general true that Rank(AA*)=Trace(AA*). For example, take
A=\left(\begin{array}{cc} 2 & 0\\ 0 & 2\\ \end{array}\right)
Then AA* has rank 2, but the trace is 8.
The second one is not true too. Take A the zero matrix and B an arbitrary matrix.
arthurhenry
Jun21-11, 02:31 PM
Perhaps I was not clear, I will phrase it correctly:
2)Does there exist matrices A and B such that AB-BA=I holds?
In particular, what is the answer to the question in the case the field is Complex NUmbers and in the case the field is Z/Z2 ?
1) Is rank(A) equal to Trace(A*A) ?
not "is the rank(A*A) equal to Trace (A*A)?" As you have pointed out this one is definittely incorrect.
micromass
Jun21-11, 02:42 PM
Perhaps I was not clear, I will phrase it correctly:
2)Does there exist matrices A and B such that AB-BA=I holds?
In particular, what is the answer to the question in the case the field is Complex NUmbers and in the case the field is Z/Z2 ?
Well, try it yourself. Take general 2x2-matrices and calculate AB-BA. Then solve the system to see whether they can equal I...
1) Is rank(A) equal to Trace(A*A) ?
not "is the rank(A*A) equal to Trace (A*A)?" As you have pointed out this one is definittely incorrect.
We have that rank(A)=rank(A*A), so the same example applies.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.