Differentiate that equation for v(t)

  • Thread starter Thread starter UrbanXrisis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiate
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around differentiating the equation v = vi * e^(-ct) to analyze the relationship between acceleration and speed over time. The subject area includes calculus and physics, specifically focusing on motion and derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of differentiation, with some expressing confusion about the derivative of exponential functions. Questions arise regarding the application of the chain rule and the role of constants in the differentiation process.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights into the differentiation process, with some clarifying the distinction between initial velocity and velocity as a function of time. There is an ongoing exploration of how to relate the derived expressions to the original equation and the expected form of acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Some participants question the assumptions regarding constants and the interpretation of variables, particularly the distinction between v_i and v(t). There is also mention of a textbook answer that raises further questions about the relationship between the derived and expected forms of acceleration.

UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
v=vi*e^(-ct)

The question asks to differentiate that equation for v(t) and thus show that the acceleration is porportional to the speed at any time.

I have no clue how to differentiate. Could someone start me off or give some clues? I'll find th rest in my textbook. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
differentiate = take the derivative?

wow...I must not be paying attention in math class
 
I don't understand... the derivative of e^x = e^x?

then the derivative of v=vi*e^(-ct) is:

a=c*e^(-ct)+e^(-ct) * Vi?
 
Last edited:
More like

a = -c*vi*e^(-ct)

Don't forget the vi.

Now, anything in that expression look familiar? Could you fit v(t) in there somewhere?

--J
 
Where did the -c come from? Doesn't the derivative of Vi become c?
 
[tex]\frac{d}{dt}v(t) = \frac{d}{dt} \left( v_i e^{-ct} \right)[/tex]

[itex]v_i[/itex] is a constant, so

[tex]\frac{d}{dt} v_i e^{-ct} = v_i \frac{d}{dt}e^{-ct}[/tex]

Make a substitution u = -ct and apply the chain rule

[tex]v_i \frac{d}{dt}e^{-ct} = v_i \left( \frac{d}{du} e^u \right) \left( \frac{du}{dt} \right) = v_i e^u \frac{d}{dt} \left( -ct \right) = v_i e^u \cdot (-c) = -c v_i e^{-ct}[/tex]

--J
 
Last edited:
thank you, that helps a lot. I was just wondering, my book gives an answer of a=-cv, where does the e go?
 
[tex]v = v_i e^{-ct}[/tex]

Plug v into the book's expression for a and see if it matches up with what you got. Find the e?

--J
 
  • #10
[tex]v = v_i e^{-ct}[/tex]
[tex]a = -c v_i[/tex]

[tex]v_i e^{-ct}= -c v_i[/tex]
[tex]e^{-ct}= -c[/tex]
?
 
  • #11
You're confusing [itex]v_i[/itex] and v(t).

[itex]v_i[/itex] is the initial velocity, i.e. the velocity at time = 0, or v(0).

v is the velocity as a function of time, i.e. [itex]v_i e^{-ct}[/itex], or v(t).

Remember that [itex]v_i[/itex] is a constant.

--J
 
  • #12
okay, I understand, thanks for all your help.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K