What is the connection between integrability and Lebesgue measure zero?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter philosophking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrability
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between integrability and Lebesgue measure zero, specifically highlighting a theorem that states a function is integrable if and only if its set of discontinuities has Lebesgue measure zero. The conversation references the introduction of Lebesgue integration as a superior method compared to Riemann integration, particularly for handling discontinuous functions. Key resources mentioned include Kestelman's "Lebesgue Measure" and Mathworld's entry on Lebesgue Measure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lebesgue integration
  • Familiarity with Riemann integration techniques
  • Basic knowledge of real analysis concepts
  • Comprehension of measure theory fundamentals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Kestelman's "Lebesgue Measure" in Modern Theories of Integration
  • Explore the concept of outer and inner measures in measure theory
  • Learn about the implications of discontinuities on integrability
  • Research the differences between Riemann and Lebesgue integration methods
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, mathematicians interested in measure theory, and educators teaching integration techniques will benefit from this discussion.

philosophking
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
My analysis professor, a few weeks ago, when we were talking about integrability, introduced the concept of Lebesgue measure zero. He put up a theorem stating that the set of discontinuities of a function are of Lebesgue measure zero if and only if the function is integrable. This is, of course, after defining lebesgue measure zero.

I've tried to google for this and haven't found it. Is it normally introduced in an introductory real analysis class? Where exactly does Lebesgue measure come about from? References to books, etc. would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
my analysis prof introduced lebesgue integration this way:

In riemann integration we approximate the integral by dividing up the x interval into equal subintervals. then we take one point in each subinterval and evaluate the function there and multiply by the length of the subinterval. add these up and approximate the integral

this is obviously a stupoid way to approximate the integral since there is no reaon for the function not to have wildly different values on the subinterval even if rather small. e.g. if the function is discontinuous at apoint, then it may have wildly diferent values on every interval containing that point no matter how small. this amkes it ahrd to intregrate discontinuous functions by this method.

a much better way, if you think,about how you average a set of scores e,g,, is you ask how many people made a certain score and yopu multiply that score by the number of epople making that score.

so the good way is to divide up th y axis. i.e. sudivide the you xis into various possible values and then ask how at many points the function ahd each range of values.

then of course you are faced with the challenge of measuring the size of the inverse image of an intervalk unders ome function and that can be a very strange loking set. lebesgue undertook to emasure the size of such sets.


then you start by trying how to cover the set with a sequence of intervals, and asking how short you can make the sum of the lengths of those intervals. that the "outer measure" of the set. you define the inner measure analogously and say the set ahs measure if those two numbers are the same.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K