HELP w/ coefficient of kinetic friction problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the coefficient of kinetic friction between a puck and ice. The scenario describes a puck that is hit and decelerates uniformly, with the goal of determining the coefficient of kinetic friction without a given mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between forces acting on the puck, questioning how to derive the coefficient of friction without knowing the mass. Some suggest using free body diagrams and Newton's laws, while others express confusion about calculating the normal force without mass.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing insights about the equations involved and how to relate acceleration to the coefficient of friction. There is a recognition of the challenge posed by the unknown mass, and some guidance has been offered regarding the use of equations to eliminate mass from the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need for a clear understanding of the forces involved, particularly the normal force, and how it relates to the coefficient of friction. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the approach due to the lack of mass information, which is a central point of discussion.

WCU
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
ok, i have a problem and w/o a given mass i am lost on how to solve it.

"What is the coefficient of kinetic friction between the ice and the puck in the problem above?"

problem above states, "A Carolina Hurricanes player hits a puck with his hockey stick during a practice, giving the puck an initial speed of 5.50m/s. The puck decelerates uniformly and comes to rest after traveling 25.0m. What is the rate of acceleration for the puck?"
-answer is 0.605m/s^2

Please Help Me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you draw yourself a free body diagram of the puck? Try to figure out what forces are working in the horizontal direction. And remember, F = ma.
 
yes, i am aware of that, but the MASS is UNKNOWN

if anyone knows an alternate formula (one that doesn't require mass) i would be most grateful

thanks for your help...
 
Last edited:
you don't need the mass

watch

now that you know the acceleration due to the friction (since the friction force stops it)

[tex]F = ma = \mu F_{n} = \mu mg[/tex]

where Fn is normal force of the puck and mu is the co efficient of friction.
 
thanks for the help, the formula makes sense, sorta, but i was never taught how to get the normal force without the mass, so I'm still lost, but not as lost

i do know the answer is 0.0617 ... i just don't know how to get there ...
 
WCU said:
thanks for the help, the formula makes sense, sorta, but i was never taught how to get the normal force without the mass, so I'm still lost, but not as lost

i do know the answer is 0.0617 ... i just don't know how to get there ...

normal force without mass?? come again??

in that equality i have simply used Newtons first law that F = ma and frictional force is F = mu Fn = mu mg and equated the two together and eliminate the mass factor
 
I thought m = mass... i need the coefficient of friction (u), and i don't have F, Fn, or m ... what units do i use? i feel like the answer is right in front of me and I'm just too blind to see it
 
ok realize this FOR ANY FORCE F = ma

secondly Force of friction = u Fn = u mg (because Force of friction is mg when there is no angle involved)

now use the first and second lines and you can equate ma = u mg

a = u g

u = a / g
 
so (0.605m/s^2)/(9.80m/s^2)=u=0.0617, which happens ot be the answer i was looking for.

thankyou so much
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K