Thermodynamics problem- paint-ball being launched.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Urmi Roy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a thermodynamics problem involving the launch of a paintball using compressed carbon dioxide. The scenario includes a gun barrel and a chamber filled with CO2 gas, with specific parameters provided for temperature, dimensions, and assumptions regarding the gas behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of the work done in an adiabatic process to find the initial pressure required for the paintball to exit the muzzle at a specified speed. There are discussions about the assumptions made regarding the external pressure and the volume contributions of the paintball.

Discussion Status

Some participants are questioning the assumption that the external pressure is zero, while others are clarifying the implications of this assumption on the calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of how to correctly apply the ideal gas equations and the conditions under which they hold true.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem specifies the pressure of the environment as zero and that the ball's contribution to the gas volume can be neglected, leading to discussions about the implications of these constraints on the calculations.

Urmi Roy
Messages
743
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Some paint ball rifles use compressed carbon dioxide to launch the paint ball.The system consists of a gun barrel with an inner diameter of 2 cm and 40 cm long. A chamber, 15 cm
long, is charged with CO2 gas at 300 K and a pin holds the ball in place. When the pin is pulled, the paint ball is launched.


f.)If the expansion process is reversible, please find the initial pressure required for the paint
ball to exit the muzzle at 100 m/s. Please assume the CO2 can be modeled as an ideal gas where the gas constant and specific heat at constant volume for CO2 are R = 189 J/kg-K and cv = 662 J/kg-K,respectively. Since the expansion process is fast and the thermal conductivity of carbon dioxide is low, you may assume the heat transfers to the muzzle and ball are zero. In addition, please assume (for the sake of simplicity) that the pressure of the environment is zero and that the ball’s contribution to the gas volume(s) can be neglected.


Homework Equations




Work done in an adiabatic process= (P1V1-P2V2)/(1.4-1), where 1.4=Cp/Cv=polytropic index for adiabatic process.

The Attempt at a Solution



I was thinking if we could use the above formula...since the external pressure is 0, P2=0...so we now equate P1V1/(1.4-1) to the kinetic energy of the paint ball...we know the volume V1, acc. to the problem, so P1 comes out...the answer I get is near the one they provided on the soln too...but is my procedure correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure p2 = 0?

BTW I hope they mean the chamber has the same cross-sectional area as that of the barrel.

How did you get p1 BTW?

(Ignore my first equation perviously. ΔU doesn't directly enter the problem.
 
Last edited:
rude man said:
Are you sure p2 = 0?

In the question it says "pressure of the environment is zero and that the ball’s contribution to the gas volume(s) can be neglected."



rude man said:
BTW I hope they mean the chamber has the same cross-sectional area as that of the barrel.

ya, from what its seems, i think we can safely assume that.

rude man said:
How did you get p1 BTW?

So we have p2=0, so P1V1/(1.4-1)=work done= 1/2 (mvsquared) (kinetic energy of the ball)

Knowing the other terms, we get P1..thats what we're supposed to find here.
 
Pressure p2 is not zero. It's the pressure just before the ball leaves the barrel. After that, mass is not conserved and all your beautiful idea-gas equations go down the drain ... the reason they specify atmospheric p = 0 is so that all the work ∫pdV accumulated during passage in the barrel is translated into k.e., and p can be the pressure in the barrel. Otherwise there would be a Δp = p(barrel) - p(atmospheric) which would confuse matters, albeit in my opinion not excessively.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K