Two stacked blocks on a table. Friction problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves calculating the maximum force that can be applied to a lower block without causing an upper block to slide off. The upper block has a mass of 8.2 kg, while the lower block has a mass of 35 kg. The coefficients of friction are 0.14 for static friction between the blocks and 0.22 for kinetic friction between the lower block and the table. By applying Newton's second law and solving simultaneous equations, the maximum force can be expressed as F ≤ μ_s * m_1 * g * (1 + m_2/m_1) + μ_k * g * (m_1 + m_2).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law of motion
  • Knowledge of static and kinetic friction coefficients
  • Ability to solve simultaneous equations
  • Familiarity with basic physics concepts such as mass and acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Newton's second law in multi-body systems
  • Learn about frictional forces and their coefficients in detail
  • Practice solving simultaneous equations in physics problems
  • Explore real-world applications of static and kinetic friction in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and engineers involved in design and safety assessments of stacked systems.

HeRo
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
:cry:

I need help with the following problem, I have tried a few different things, but none of them seem to be working:

Two blocks are stacked on a table. The upper block has a mass of 8.2 kg and the lower block has a mass of 35 kg. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the table is 0.22 and the coefficient of static friction between the upper and lower blocks is 0.14. How much force can be applied to the lower block without having the upper block slide off?

Can someone explain how I would do this? It's got something to do with acceleration.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HeRo said:
...I have tried a few different things

Like what? Please show us some attempt at solving the problem, or at least reasoning through it to some degree.
 
Last edited:
HeRo said:
:cry:

I need help with the following problem, I have tried a few different things, but none of them seem to be working:

Two blocks are stacked on a table. The upper block has a mass of 8.2 kg and the lower block has a mass of 35 kg. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the table is 0.22 and the coefficient of static friction between the upper and lower blocks is 0.14. How much force can be applied to the lower block without having the upper block slide off?

Can someone explain how I would do this? It's got something to do with acceleration.

Apply Newton's second law to each block. Then solve simultaneous equations until you have an expression for F in terms of known variables. For the upper block
[itex] \begin{align*}<br /> \Sigma F_y & = 0 \\<br /> n_1 - m_1g & = 0 \\<br /> n_1 & = m_1g \\<br /> \Sigma F_x & = m_1a \\<br /> f_\mathrm{s} & = m_1a \\<br /> f_\mathrm{s} & \leq \mu_\mathrm{s}n_1\\<br /> m_1a & \leq \mu_\mathrm{s}m_1g<br /> \end{align*}[/itex]
For the lower block
[itex] \begin{align*}<br /> \Sigma F_y & = 0 \\<br /> n_2 - m_2g - n_1 & = 0 \\<br /> n_2 & = n_1 + m_2g \\<br /> n_2 & = g(m_1 + m_2) \\<br /> \Sigma F_x & = m_2 a \\<br /> F - f_\mathrm{k} - f_\mathrm{s} & = m_2a \\<br /> F - \mu_\mathrm{k}n_2 - f_\mathrm{s} & = m_2a \\<br /> F - \mu_\mathrm{k}g(m_1 + m_2) - f_\mathrm{s} & = \frac{m_2f_\mathrm{s}}{m_1} \\<br /> F - \mu_\mathrm{k}g(m_1 + m_2) & = f_\mathrm{s}\left(1 +\frac{m_2}{m_1}\right) \\<br /> f_\mathrm{s} & = \frac{F - \mu_\mathrm{k}g(m_1 + m_2)}{1 +\frac{m_2}{m_1}} \\<br /> \frac{F - \mu_\mathrm{k}g(m_1 + m_2)}{1 +\frac{m_2}{m_1}}& \leq \mu_\mathrm{s}m_1g \\<br /> \end{align*}[/itex]
so
[itex] \begin{align*}<br /> F & \leq \mu_\mathrm{s}m_1g\left(1 +\frac{m_2}{m_1}\right) + \mu_\mathrm{k}g(m_1 + m_2)<br /> \end{align*}[/itex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K