Solve Physics Problem: Wave Function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving a particle's wave function, specifically its normalization, frequency, potential energy function, and expected position value. The problem requires understanding of the Schrödinger equation and wave function properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the normalization of the wave function and the necessary integration limits. There are attempts to clarify the differentiation process related to deriving the potential energy function from the Schrödinger equation. Questions arise about terminology and definitions, particularly around the terms "differentiate" and "derive."

Discussion Status

Guidance has been offered regarding normalization and differentiation, with some participants expressing reluctance to perform certain calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and processes involved, with corrections noted in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of quantum mechanics and the specific requirements of the problem, including the need for precise mathematical expressions and definitions. There is a mention of differing interpretations of terminology used in the context of the problem.

mlee
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
hey who can help me with this physics problem?

A particle of mass m is in the state:
Ψ (x, t) = Aexp[-a(sqrt (mx^2) / h)-i (at / sqrt(m )) ]
where A and a are positive real constants.
a) Determine A.
b) What is the frequency ƒ associated with the wave function of this particle?
Explain your reasoning.
c) For what potential energy function U(x), does Ψ satisfy the Schrödinger
equation?
d) If we use the interpretation of [Ψ(x)]^2 dx as the probability that a particle of
mass m can be found in a region of width dx around the position x,
calculate the expected value (average value) of the position x.


Many thanx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A. Normalize it.
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \psi^*(x) \psi(x) dx =1[/tex]
B. Please don't make me do that. I have my own. It's probably just hard work.
C. Differentiate it and place it in Shroedinger's equation. You'll get the potential.
D. By definition:
[tex]<x>=\int \psi^*(x) x \psi(x)\,dx[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Palindrom said:
C. Derive it and place it in Shroedinger's equation. You'll get the potential.

By "derive", you mean "differentiate" or "take the derivative", right? Those things don't mean the same as "derive".
 
Nylex said:
By "derive", you mean "differentiate" or "take the derivative", right? Those things don't mean the same as "derive".
That's what I meant. You'll have to forgive me, I'm not used to saying it in English.
 
Palindrom said:
A. Normalize it.
[tex]\int_{a}^{b} \psi dx =1[/tex]
For a and b being - and + infinity.
B. Please don't make me do that. I have my own. It's probably just hard work.
C. Differentiate it and place it in Shroedinger's equation. You'll get the potential.
D. By definition:
[tex]<x>=\int \psi^*(x) x \psi(x)\,dx[/tex]

1.Your edited your post and now it's "differentiate".
2.The first formula is incorrect;it has something missing:
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \psi^*(x) \psi(x) dx =1[/tex]
The rest is correct and i agree with you.
 
dextercioby said:
1.Your edited your post and now it's "differentiate".
2.The first formula is incorrect;it has something missing:
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \psi^*(x) \psi(x) dx =1[/tex]
The rest is correct and i agree with you.
Thanks for the correction, I edited.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K