Can we change Euler's Formula?

[Ahmidahn]

Is there a way to take Euler's formula "e^(i∅)" -which gives a circle; and change it into a logarithmic spiral?

Does a simple modification like " e^-(i∅/n) " make any sense mathematically?

If it actually does, my other question would be; supposing that such a logarithmic spiral is in fact just a head on view of a space curve with parameters like:

y=tsint
x=tcost
z=e^(-t/12)

how does one go about finding the arc length of such a curve? I've attempted to use the general arc length formula on this one, but continually end up with something like:

s = ∫ √e^-t/12 + t^2 + 1

which is, apparently, impossible to solve.

Is there a way to use the complex variable in a formula like Euler's formula to create a logarithmic spiral? And if so, how does one go about calculating the arc length of such a thing?

[Simon Bridge]

Yeah - you change the amplitude with angle.

remember - euler's formula is for a circle in the complex plane.
the logarithmic spiral formula is for the real plane.
to change it to complex - just multiply the y parameterization by the square-root of minus one.

OR: you could just set Aexp(it) so that A=the radius of the spiral at angle t.

note: exp(it/n) just changes the frequency of the rotation.

[Ahmidahn]

Maybe something like:

(cos \theta + i sin\theta)/w

would translate into:

[exp(i\theta)] / w where w is some decreasing function related to \theta? I don't know. I've been stuck on this one for almost two years.

Thanks for your help.

[Ahmidahn]

The Wikipedia entry for "Circular Polarization" has the "classical sinusoidal plane wave solution of the electromagnetic wave equation" - and the math behind it as well.

It's similar, in general, to what I'm looking for. The math is beyond me. I actually know what some of those things are, but I think I would need to enroll in school again to understand usefully.

Tough stuff. Maybe I should ask some physics guys how to transform Circular Polarization into Spiral Polarization.

[robert2734]

what if we take ei\Theta and turn it into e-a+i\Theta? Now we have a logrithmic spiral no?.

[Ahmidahn]

Yes. That would seem to make sense. Correct me if I'm wrong reinterpreting the equation.

e-a + i\theta = (e-a)(ei\theta)=

(e-a)(cos\theta + i sin\theta)

What kind of variable is "a" in this situation?

Is this a three dimensional curve, or rather, can it be visualized in 3 dimensions?

Thanks for your help there.

[Ahmidahn]

I'm gonna have to suss that out for the arc length...hmm...getting closer.

[Simon Bridge]

What kind of variable is "a" in this situation?

a is an angle. Anything inside the exponential function must be dimentionless.

Is this a three dimensional curve, or rather, can it be visualized in 3 dimensions?
You can represent/visualize the curve how you like.

Taken as a locus of points in the complex plane, it is two dimensional.
If a is a constant, then the locus is a circle.

But you can also make the angle, any of them, a function of time - in which case, e^{i\theta(t)} is rotating. You can make a a function of time, or even of a third space dimension if you want ... and plot a locus in 3D or an evolving spiral path in 3+1.

Consider:
Ae^{\alpha t}e^{i\beta t} = Ae^{(\alpha+i\beta)t} = Ae^{zt}
if \alpha=\beta=1, what is the shape mapped out in the complex plane?

You could also look at: at[\cos(bt)+i\sin(bt)], where a and b are arbitrary constants.

Have fun.

[tommyli]

Replace i in Euler's formula with i -1 and you get a logarithmic spiral:
e^{(i - 1)t} parametrically describes a logarithmic spiral in the complex plane

[Simon Bridge]

In other words, in OP notation, a=-t \theta = t.
But you can have fun experimenting with lots of different spirals besides the golden one :)

[Dickfore]

Is there a way to take Euler's formula "e^(i∅)" -which gives a circle; and change it into a logarithmic spiral?

Does a simple modification like " e^-(i∅/n) " make any sense mathematically?


Please define a "logarithmic spiral".

[Ahmidahn]

"Logarithmic spiral"= r = a(exp)-b(theta) in polar coordinates

Parametric form:

x(t) = r(t) \cos(t) = ae^{bt} \cos(t)\,
y(t) = r(t) \sin(t) = ae^{bt} \sin(t)\,

[Ahmidahn]

Are you wondering why I write the power in the exponent (theta) over "n"? Or what?

[Ahmidahn]

Thanks again for all the replies. I will be pondering this one for a while.