Capturing an Asteroid: Creating Earth's 2nd Moon

  • Thread starter Thread starter errorist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroid Moon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of capturing an asteroid and placing it into orbit around Earth, exploring both the theoretical and practical aspects of such a mission. Participants consider the implications of having a second moon and the technical challenges involved in altering an asteroid's trajectory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that capturing and studying an asteroid would be preferable to redirecting or destroying it, envisioning the potential of Earth having two moons.
  • Another participant notes that capturing the asteroid would require a decelerating force to reduce its velocity to match Earth's orbital velocity, implying the need for a rocket to rendezvous with the asteroid and provide sufficient \Delta V.
  • A different viewpoint raises the possibility that the asteroid might already be traveling at a speed compatible with Earth's orbit, questioning the necessity of significant deceleration.
  • One participant queries whether current technology could effectively direct an asteroid away from Earth, assuming there is sufficient time to act.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the feasibility of capturing an asteroid, stating that the energy required to place it in orbit exceeds current technological capabilities and that even minor adjustments for distant threats are challenging.
  • A later reply mentions that while elements exist to deflect certain near-Earth objects, an integrated system is lacking, and it may take years to develop a viable mission.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of capturing an asteroid, with some believing it is possible under certain conditions while others argue that current technology is insufficient for such a task. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the practicality of the proposed methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to current technology and the time required to develop systems for asteroid capture or deflection. There are also uncertainties regarding the asteroid's speed and trajectory at the time of a near miss.

errorist
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
What would be the best way to capture this asteroind and place it in a orbit about the Earth? It would be better to capture and study it then to just redirect it or destroy it. Imagine Earth with two Moons.

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/asteroid_update_041227.html
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
To capture the asteroid and 'park' it in orbit would require a decelerating force to bring its velocity down to that which would be compatible with an orbital velocity in Earth's gravity field.

This would require having a rocket rendezvous with the asteroid and then having sufficient reserve to provide the necessary [itex]\Delta V[/itex].
 
This thing is already hauling in the coal. What if it is already traveling near the speed needed to do this?
 
Last edited:
Astronuc,
Do you think we presently have the capability to direct an asteroid away from hitting earth, assuming we have sufficient time of course?
 
Actually I think it will be going slower than the Earth when the near miss occurs - not that that makes any difference. The amount of energy required to place it in Earth orbit is beyond our current technology.

Even diverting an asteroid that isn't due to hit for 24 years is on the limits of our technology, and to turn a 24 year distant hit into a near miss requires only the tiniest of nudges, compared with the massive shove required to get it into Earth orbit.
 
We have elements of system that could be used to deflect NEO 2004 MN4, but we do not have an integrated delivery or missions system. Right now it is not a significant issue within NASA. It might take in the range of 5 years to put a system together.

See also the related thread - https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=57882 - which discusses the likelihood of impact.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
Replies
35
Views
9K