Computational Physics - Scaling

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a computational physics project involving the simulation of a system with two non-test masses and several test masses. The original poster seeks clarification on the concept of scaling in the context of setting unit masses and the gravitational constant G to 1.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of scaling masses and the gravitational constant, questioning how to appropriately set units for both mass and distance. There are inquiries about whether time also needs to be scaled and the specific method for scaling distance in relation to G.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the scaling process, while others have raised questions about the definitions and assumptions related to non-test masses. The discussion is ongoing, with multiple interpretations being explored regarding the setup of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of clarity regarding the definition of "non-test mass" and how it relates to the scaling of the system. Additionally, the original poster's understanding of the scaling process appears to be incomplete, leading to further questions about the necessary steps.

secret2
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am not sure if I'm posting on the right place. I am currently working on a computational project. It's about simulating a system with two non-test masses and a bunch of test masses. The instruction sheet says that we should "scale the problem carefully by setting the units such that the non-test masses have a mass of 1 and G, the universal gravitation constant, equals 1."

The lecturer did a bad job explaining what scaling really is, and I am not sure what exactly I should do concerning scaling here. Could someone give me a hand?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you write doesn't make a whole lot of sense. If you had one mass, you could certainly choose ITS mass as the "unit of mass" and so it would have mass 1- you would then "scale" by dividing all other masses by the "unit" mass.

However, if you have "two non-test masses", unless they are both the same mass, obviously you can't have both with mass 1.


Once you have selected a given unit of mass, setting G (I presume you don't mean "g") equal to 1 is a matter of choosing an appropriate distance measure.
 
HallsofIvy,

Thank you for your help, I have been desperately looking for reply.

First of all, you are right that the two non-test masses have equal masses. I am not sure why you commented that "obviously you can't have both with mass 1".

And after having selected a given unit of mass, setting G equal to 1 is "a matter of choosing an appropriate distance measure" as you mentioned. To be explicit, I have two questions:

1. Do I need to 'scale' both distance and time?
2. Is it true that I have to divide distance by the sqrt of G in order to scale it?

Many thanks!
 
You said you had two "non-test masses". You didn't say they were the same. What exactly IS a "non-test mass"??
G has units of [itex]\frac{m^3}{(kg)(sec^2)} Yes, you will need to scale all of them. The point is choosing each of those so that G is 1.[/itex]
 
When I said 'test mass' I mean that they will not exert any gravitational attraction onto the other test/non-test masses (they of course REACT to the attraction of the non-test masses). So you can say that there are only two sources of gravitational attraction.

Cheers
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
808
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K