Potential energy of a two-body system

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential energy of a two-body system consisting of masses m and 2m separated by a distance r. Participants explore the nature of gravitational potential energy (PE), its dependence on the system as a whole rather than individual masses, and the derivation of the potential energy formula.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that gravitational potential energy is a property of the system, not of the individual masses.
  • Participants present the formula for gravitational potential energy as U = - \frac{G m_1 m_2}{r}, questioning its derivation from the gravitational force equation F = G m_1 m_2 / r^2.
  • One participant discusses the integration process to derive the potential energy from the force, indicating that potential energy at infinity is taken to be zero.
  • There is a discussion about the choice of reference frame, with some participants suggesting that if one mass is significantly larger than the other, it can be treated as an inertial frame, while others argue that center-of-mass coordinates should be used when the masses are comparable.
  • One participant mentions the concept of reduced mass and its application in simplifying the analysis of two-body systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the formula for gravitational potential energy and its derivation, but there is disagreement regarding the choice of reference frame and the implications of using reduced mass in the analysis of the system.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the relative sizes of the masses and the implications for reference frames, which may affect the interpretation of the gravitational potential energy in different scenarios.

AlonsoMcLaren
Messages
89
Reaction score
2
If two masses, m and 2m, are separated by a distance r, what is the potential energy of mass m? What is the potential energy of mass 2m? What is the potential energy of the system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The gravitational PE is a property of the system, not of the individual masses.
 
Doc Al said:
The gravitational PE is a property of the system, not of the individual masses.

So what is the value of PE of the system?
 
AlonsoMcLaren said:
So what is the value of PE of the system?
The gravitational PE of two masses is given by:
[tex]U = - \frac{G m_1 m_2}{r}[/tex]
Where m1 and m2 are the masses and r the distance between them.
 
Doc Al said:
The gravitational PE of two masses is given by:
[tex]U = - \frac{G m_1 m_2}{r}[/tex]
Where m1 and m2 are the masses and r the distance between them.

How to derive it from F=Gm1m2/(r^2)
 
[tex]\Delta U = \int_{r_1}^{r_2}\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}[/tex]

In this case, it's easiest to integrate along the radial, and taking potential at infinity to be zero, you get this.

[tex]U = \int_{\infty}^{r}G\frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2}dr = -G\frac{m_1 m_2}{r}[/tex]
 
AlonsoMcLaren said:
How to derive it from F=Gm1m2/(r^2)
In general:
[tex]F = - \frac{dU}{dr}[/tex]
So, to go from F to U, integrate.

(Oops... K^2 beat me to it.)
 
K^2 said:
[tex]\Delta U = \int_{r_1}^{r_2}\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}[/tex]

In this case, it's easiest to integrate along the radial, and taking potential at infinity to be zero, you get this.

[tex]U = \int_{\infty}^{r}G\frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2}dr = -G\frac{m_1 m_2}{r}[/tex]

So are you using m1 (or m2) as frame of reference? If so, the frame is non-inertial.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ilyandm
Depends. If m1>>m2, then the acceleration of m1 is negligible, and we can use it as an inertial frame of reference. Or vice versa. But if m1 and m2 are comparable, you are right, and we have to use center-of-mass coordinates. In that case, r is the distance from center of mass, and either m1 or m2 is the reduced mass.

The idea behind reduced mass is that with central potential, which gravity happens to be, instead of looking at two bodies orbiting each other, you can consider bodies one at a time, and treat them as if each orbits the center-of-mass point as if it was immovable point with gravitational attraction. The strength of attraction is determined by reduced mass, which you compute to be sufficient to generate same force as in the original setup.

It's a bit messy, but for two bodies it works fine. Throw in a third body, and it goes from messy to near-impossible.

P.S. Gravitational potential works out to be exactly the same, by the way, so it doesn't matter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ilyandm

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
883
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K